Saturday was opening day for Pittsburg’s Little League Baseball season. As a doting Grandma, I dutifully carried all my camera gear to the Grandson’s Opening Day Parade and first game. His coach was happy that I was taking pictures of everyone. I video taped the parade and waited around until his game later that day.
His first game started and, naturally, he was at the bottom of the line up. He also did not have a field position. Okay, out of 12 kids they can’t all be on the field and my grandson is new to the team. Some things you have to earn. The opposing team was more practiced and seemed (to me) to be made up of older children. Of course my grandson’s team was losing miserably. That didn’t seem to bother them too much though, they were just excited to play. I video taped each batter as they came to the plate so I could put together a little show to put on YouTube. One player wanted to link the file to her MySpace page.
As the batters went through the roster, I realized that we seemed to have gone around the list at least once and there were still 3 kids who had not been up to bat – my grandson being one of them. I stopped taping.
At the end of the 3rd inning, the 3 benchwarmers finally got field positions. During their next at-bat, another kid got to bat a second time and then the benchwarmers got a turn. One benchwarmer got up to the plate and my grandson took the warm-up box. After the 2nd batter was called out, the coaches called the game. I never got to see my grandson bat while the coach’s kid and most of the others batted twice.
After the game I asked the coach why there were 3 kids who never got to bat. He “explained” that this is just the way it was set up and since they called the game due to the huge mismatch in skills, he didn’t get to have everyone up to bat. He told me they had 16 at-bats and it’s just too bad that the game was called as my grandson came up. When I pointed out that there are only 12 kids on the team, with 16 at-bats, logic dictates that all the kids should have had a turn. He insisted that this is just the way it goes, using the time-worn fall-back statement “if you don’t like the way I coach, you get out here and coach your own team”; the same kind of statement everyone uses when they are wrong and they know it. This guy didn’t volunteer out of the goodness of his heart or because he wants to help kids enjoy the game – as he would have me believe – but to get his own kid a private team.
And then the coach wonders why these 3 benchwarmers have no enthusiasm for the team. It's because there isn't a "team", there's the coach's kid, his kid's friends and the benchwarmers; three separate, distinct groups that don't intermix.
So what lesson are these 3 kids learning? I was under the impression that in little league, everyone got to play regardless of skill or familial status. I am disgusted to find that this is not true. The coach is teaching these kids that you have to be related to someone or know someone in order to play. Skill or desire to play has no place here. There should be some hard fast rules to coaching kids and the coaches should be held accountable. I don’t care if they volunteer for the job. They should be required to be fair and ethical. If I had paid $200+ for my kid to play, and he sat on the bench the entire time, I would be demanding an explanation from the people who organize Little League in Pittsburg.
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 80
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 558
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 170
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 67
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 170
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 62
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 170
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 170
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 28
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16