I am not sure what it is about party political structure that you do not understand, but one thing is clear ... you seem to think that the way that you would do it is the way that it ought to be. I am not even sure I agree with your contention that what is happening at the Democratic caucuses is a waste of money and resources. Democracy is about (1) people taking part in the process, and (2) informing themselves so that the actions they take are meaningful and productive. What have you got against that? It is messy. It takes time. It's hard to get things done (purposefully). But everyone has a voice. Oh sure, the Democrats ... in California ... make sure that some of its elite get automatic appointments and do not have to participate in this free-for-all process but HEY ... almost 900 people vying for 240 seats is a sign of healthy participatory democracy and should be encouraged, not disparaged.

And this is the procedure followed only in California. Each state party has its unique means to select/elect delegates to the National Convention. This is why two separate groups of delegates from one state sometimes appear on the Convention floor and demand to be seated. And, in this respect, the Republicans are no different than the Democrats. Each state Republican Party has its own rules and methods for selecting delegates. Some are crazier than California's.

But you would have a presumptive presidential candidate handpick his or her own delegates, and view that as a more democratic process? No wonder about 28% of the American people believe in a Unitary President. Now I know where some of those folks are.