BART to begin modernizing of stations


nkannan
nkannan's picture

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3
They can very well use some of this money to lower fares on the trains and improve the parking lots, and also with more parking slots. Pleasanton/Dublin station parking lots are always so full, you just give up and keep on driving rather than take the BART. WIth gas prices stuck being so high, you could attract more commuters!
Average: 5 (1 vote)

Ian
Ian's picture

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 417
BART, what are you doing? How about focusing on real issues? How about deadening the sound of the tracks in the residential areas. 300+ decibels is not OK and it can be fixed. You know this, but since it will not improve rider numbers, you will not do it. How about drastically reducing the number of DUI and DUI accidents and fatalities by running 24 hours? Too loud for the residents? See the first part of this comment. How about a little social responsability? You are subsidized, are you not?
mcarden
mcarden's picture

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6
I travel from Macarthur to San Bruno every day on BART, and this seems like a really stupid use of $400 million to me. Who cares what the stations look like, as long as they are clean and hazard-free? Put the money into refurbishing the trains, which seem to malfunction with increasing regularity, and PLEASE do something about the track noise, it is absolutely ear-splitting at times. I've seen people cover up their ears in agony on some stretches - the noise makes it impossible to have a normal conversation.
Lari
Lari's picture

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 44
Meanwhile, they've chosen a summer when gas prices have soared (and ridership has increased) to repave entire parking lots at the Concord station. So, by 8AM, there are NO spots - even in the huge overfill lot (construction equipment and mounds of gravel were taking up a portion of that lot, too). I've had to DRIVE back home more than once because the N.Concord lot was full, too, and get a ride back to BART. Rather than risk a wasted trip, I was getting rides every morning OR taking the bus, but one day I couldn't get a ride or spare the time for the bus, so I drove in. No spots. Many people parked in the 10AM lots (they only allowed one thin strip of this parking to be used by covering up the restriction with white paper). I parked and when I got back that eve, there was a $40 ticket. You'd think they'd waive this or make SOME allowances for riders due to the inconvenience of their construction. So, I guess this is what's paying for these upgrades because they must have made a lot of money with their ridiculous and unfair citations.
harpoon
harpoon's picture

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1
That is absolutely correct, BART's priorities are way off the mark. Being able to determine BART station identities can be made much easier to passengers of the trains by adding more and larger signs that are visible to passengers from inside the trains as they are approaching stations. These signs should be lit so that they are visible through the tinted windows of the trains. Obviously, decorating the stations serves absolutely no purpose for those passengers sitting on the side of the cars in which passengers are staring at a dark wall.  That should be obvious to anyone who has ever used BART. BART is, once again, proposing to waste an obscene amount of money, to the tune of 400 million dollars, almost half a billion, on another boondoggle.    

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate the change.