2. D vs Stretch is exhausting. DT's play akin to basketball, every play they're running. We need to rotate fresh pairs of DT's in, ideally, every 10 plays. Sands, since each plays starts out running, Sands more than any DT I can imagine is suited, by his physical traits, about as badly vs ZBS as a guy can get. Sands' attributes suit Steel Curtain, perhaps, with allowances for quality. But IMMOVABLE is not really what we need vs Stretch.
3. One thing I can suggest which might help, again, to my favored DE's. For goodness sake, guys, whenever you see play going away, which of course is naturally close to 50%. When play's away---tone down the aggression, tone up the heads-up, backside discipline. THAT play will come right to you, you won't even have to work. If you're smart. Whearas, haven't you yet noticed, when you sell-out vs plays away, you sucker yourself, every time, into wake?
4. S Young is Shanahan's RB of the minute. He's that little scatty guy who burned us in DN last year on 3rd and forever, an amazing, Joe-Washington-like draw for +60, on which horrible failure of a D, we had little scatty ALL corralled, surrounded by several S&B---til we lost him in the mayhem---what happened was, he was down, Young, tackled for loss---BUT, with one hand on the ground, he managed to stay up---we lost him AND let up. Young is all bounce, no muscle. I don't know how short he is. He's a -2, no gain, -1, +25 type guy.
5. We are ideally D'd up to smother screens. Right now, we will be one of the hardest teams in football to screen against. RB's head, tho, may be a worry, here (shouldn't be, he should be fine). Even were Alston to play, we match-up dominant vs screen. Of course, little Young in space is dynamite.
6. Last year a Mile Hi, I did a film study of Michael Huff, every play vs DN. I never published it cuz the results would've heightened some already shrill hysterical hymenism. I saw 2 very pertinent things. One, for sure, for sure, Ryan went at least 3 and I'm pretty sure it was 4 straight series vs DN in Cover 2. I wanna say start H2. I thought it weird til I remembered Cover 2's great strength (CB's in the flats, belly up) vs sweep, outside run game, ZBS.
7. And two: I saw Huff, man-vs-man against that lanky WR McDonald's Bag Marshall, who ate #24's lunch. About a dozen one-on-one contests, McD's winning outright like 11. I must tell you what Huff looked like on all those plays, how he played em. This is vs run, I'm talking. Marshall's turning Huff out. SS's playing tall, he's head up as he can get, his hands are on WR, who's driving him, driving him. Michael's tall, head craned, feet turning fast over, trying to giraffe over Marshall's height to SEE, to READ, where RB's going. He's still diagnosing the play! Staring into backfield, mesmerized, like a kid's first seeing of Dorothy's winged monkeys. Or something. For football's sake, Michael, damn---the play FOR YOU is Marshall. Hello. He's right in front of you. I'd think you could FEEL him if not see him. My point: SS vs ZBS, Gibril Wilson. For Raiders' sake, SS, BLOW HIM UP. You gotta blocker, man, don't tackle, don't work thru---THIS AIN'T HOOPS---blow him the blank up!
8. Cutler's gonna stay away from Huff. Michael---jump TE! Gibril---expect help behind vs TE, lots of help. BLOW UP McD's, or whoever. Nam takes away one side. They try #21, they gonna pay. Shanahan wil take a few shots there, hope for that one, rare, key lapse---3rd down, red zone. Hall's on his own---let's see what you got. Islands are tuff. DN's not much. Patience with Hall, Nation. He must win IN THE LONG RUN. He's being asked a lot. He doesn't have to be total shutdown to be worth it. TD's, number 1. No TD's yielded. 3rd downs, secondly. The longer, the worse.
9. Turnovers, our returners, McFad, Russell. Return smart. Possession first, if that's all, we'll take it. P and KO cover---spectacularly consistent thru preseason, would only expose as the jokes they are those exhibitions if coverers let up now.
10. Russell running in red zone is a potential TD machine. This kid could potentially rush for 20 TD's. D's should have fits. Kif---run him, inside the 20.
11. Kif will open with his whole playbook. One series. If he feels he must, 2. Then, he'll run marathons. Establishing something. Finally, some time in H2, early Q4 the latest, when the moment of the game has come, Kif will attack---downfield, downfield, downfield. I see Miller, you do too.
12. PUNT THE GODDAMN BALL ON 4TH DOWN! I never question play call, too girly for me. But on 4th down I reserve the right to be my child-self. If Kif's 4th down games-in-a-play cost us vs DN I'm gonna be pissed. It'd be different if he WENT FOR IT on 3rd down, instead of always +3 on 3rd and 6.
13. No FG's over 60, unless inside :10. Maybe in DN.
14. Somehow, McFad holding the ball feels super key to me, a hunch.
15. WR's is gonna be a crapshoot. If a few good things happen, don't start getting your hopes up. For that to happen, we'd have to see at least 2 straight games with some consistency. Then, perhaps some optimism.
16. DE's vs DN: if play is toward you, get upfield and hold your ground, head up, crane, see, hold your ground, don't get stretched, you'd almost have to die in the "hole" (for DE?!!!) before you allow yourself to get stretched, head up---turn the play in. Don't make tackles, turn plays in.
17. DE's: if play's away---relax, head up, backside discipline and angles, if it comes your way, you'll see, oh boy. Don't take yourself out.
18. Don't blitz.
Professor Eyepatch
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 181
....in 18 pre-season drives the "TD Machine" produced one TD and had 1 yard rushing on 1 run ..... Last year he had 4 yds on 5 rushes but those may not have been designed runs. I guess you could say Kif has kept the machine under wraps (yah...YAH! That's the ticket!)
If we're going to win I think it is up to our running game and our D. I don't expect much help from the TD machine... at least not yet. I would be very happy if I'm wrong though.
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 506
very good, friend, and maybe i'm wrong, i'm out on a branch, i know, but our O has absolutely seized up in red zone, and russell running is a dimension i don't think D's are gonna enjoy handling, as an added dimension down there, the added threat will open up what has been totally clogged, roll/run, roll/pass option, run QB inside the 20
like hoss, it opened up an O that was stuffed in 93, we went to CN, 0-10, lost in the snow, jaeger missed 4 FG's, we were like shut out, til Q4, too late, down close, we finally got in when hoss ran it in himself
that was it, O was go the rest of the way, hoss ran for a TD in every game the rest of the year but one, we beat BF to save the year in BF the week after CN, i'll bet you remember, hoss and timmer hooked up for 181 including winning Q4 TD, out and up, R side, about 29 yards, we won on a late fumble recovery, nolan harrison, i think, hoss ran one in that day
we earned a playoff spot on the last sunday when we overcame 17 points to beat elway/sharpe, hoss hit alex wright, R flag, last play regulation, 2 big plays in OT, a cross to horton for 20, a scramble by hoss, L sideline, +20, then the winning FG, after elam missed from 40 in Q5
running down close has the potential to open us up, this kid's wheels have super impressed me, the ease with which he ran away from haynesworth and VDB and b berry...
yeah, we'll have to see, kif ain't gonna do it, either way
cliff
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 181
You're probably right on all accounts. We've certainly had our problems in the red zone and turning the kid loose would almost certainly catch the D off guard....the first couple times.
But you're also probably right in that Kif won't do it. I'd say he is more likely to turn to it as a last resort...of course it is too late by then, less likely to succeed, and makes the team look desperate...which we may be by then.  It would be much better to pull the trigger in game 1. Even if you don't run him again for several games they'll still be focusing on it and it will pay dividends.
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 506
yes, gasbag, it's not gonna happen, and we're gonna have fits inside the 20 all year, but if kif were to work up and use a run/pass option package down there with russell, our RB's would be able to run it in, teams are not gonna wanna D vs russell on the edge, he's very scary out there (i hope), thanks, cliff
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 181
It looked like he tried it twice tonight and it blew up in our face.