"Trans - Obia" - or What's 'Love' Got to do with it?

I will consolidate two threads here Kitty, and briefly address your positions in another. I submit that the fact is we live in 'Extreme' times and the types of 'Extremists' attacking our society BAMN (By Any Means Necessary) are not properly described or opposed unless they are properly identified and their actions properly explained.

While I do not use obscenity or profanity, I do identify such Hatemongers as such and clearly. Likewise I also identify the types of intrinsically aberrant, degrading and objectively disordered Hatreds and Perversions that inform and motivate their agenda, without much concern for the ‘feelings’ of those pushing such Evil.

Undoubtedly some (including apparently you) find this discomforting, but my response is that my posts are well researched and both Factually Accurate and the language used Clinically Correct - if highly Ungood. Hence, my duty to the Truth supported by Facts is also a duty of Candor – even if it shines an unfavorable light on those extremists pushing such Evil.

Part of the problem I see is just where you consider the 'Middle' to be, and thus what constitutes 'Extreme.' The article you (negatively - "transphobia"?) responded to about self mutilating drag kings & queens is a good example - is support of this mutilation pogrom a 'normal' middle of the road position that only an 'extremist' would object to (which might make you such an ‘extremists’ if you fail to properly pander) -- or is the tax subsidy for and mandatory pandering to such aberrations in itself extreme, and thus rejection of such hateful perversions a 'middle' position?

Of course that presumes that the 'middle' is the right place to be - a compromise half way between good and evil, as opposed to say wholly on the side of 'Good'... Which is of course where I place myself. Ahem.

Anywayyy, I include the following article about an attack on a Church and the Congregation for your perusal, and of course identification of the ‘Extremists’ in the story. Is it, as the Resident Harpies of this board would scream – the Church and Congregation that are acting in an Extreme manner (rejecting Homo-Anal Coprophile and Dyke Misandrist Behaviors)…

Or is it the Hatemongering Perverts (Too extreme a term for them – I submit Not) who Attacked the Church and Congregation who are Extreme – or is there some middle position in this Dynamic you can find?

BTW – the Attack could not be considered a “Hate Crime” under the new law – because the Proper Targets were Attacked, as opposed to anyone standing up to the Assault by these Perverted Hatemongers (who have political immunity Because of their Behaviors), which would have certainly qualified for conviction and imprisonment for the Thought Crime of “Ism-Obia” at the very least?

Ohso.

And Yes – I am Very Funny, in a rather Pythonesque manner, provided of course you nave a sense of humor.

.................................................................................................................................................

FAITH UNDER FIRE
Lesbians, condoms go wild in attack on Christian church
Making out at pulpit, shouting blasphemies in front of children
November 11, 2008 By Bob Unruh © 2009 WorldNetDaily

Worshippers at a Bible-teaching church in Lansing, Mich., were stunned when members of a pro-homosexual, pro-anarchy organization named Bash Back interrupted their service to fling propaganda and condoms around the sanctuary, drape a profane banner from the balcony and feature two lesbians making out at the pulpit.

According to a blog posting by Nick De Leeuw on Right Michigan, the Bash Back organization orchestrated a protest in front of Mount Hope Church to draw the church's security staff away from the sanctuary.
Then Bash Backers who had dressed up and mixed in with church worshippers took action.

According to De Leeuw, "Prayer had just finished when men and women stood up in pockets across the congregation, on the main floor and in the balcony.
"'Jesus was gay,' they shouted among other profanities and blasphemies as they rushed the stage. Some forced their way through rows of women and kids to try to hang a profane banner from the balcony while others began tossing fliers into the air. Two women made their way to the pulpit and began to kiss," he wrote.
He cited the Bash Back organization's own announcement of other items members brought into the church, including "a megaphone, noise makers, condoms, glitter by the bucket load, confetti, pink fabric. ..."

According to the alternative Lansing City Pulse – which reported it was notified of the protest ahead of time and sent a reporter along instead of warning the church – the protesters also screamed at parishioners and pulled the church facility's fire alarm. Printed material protesters distributed said, "We specialize in confronting homophobia, transphobia and every and all other forms of oppression."

The report said Bash Back issued a statement today confirming its Sunday action at Mount Hope, which has about 5,000 church participants, because it participates in "the repression of queers."
On the newspaper's forum page, a contributor commented, "Homosexuals and anarchists. A perfect combination of human beings with no hope, no morals, no future."
Many demonstrators fled and the rest were quiet after sheriff's officers were summoned.

"Mount Hope churchgoers were unclear as to what the purpose of the demonstration was," said a statement from David Williams, a spokesman for the church.
"The leadership of Mount Hope Church does not attempt to identify the church as anti-homosexual, anti-choice, or right wing. The church does take the Bible at face value and believes what the Bible says to be the truth," Williams' statement continued.

"According to the Bible, Mount Hope Church believes homosexuality to be a sin, just as fornication, stealing, drunkenness, and lying are sins. No sin greater than the next. Mount Hope Church strives to follow Jesus' example of loving the sinner but not the sin while helping people change their lives for God's glory and their improved quality of life. Mount Hope Church also recognizes that to each person God grants freewill."

The church then offered help for people "caught up in unwanted sexual sin, drug abuse, and many other areas."
De Leeuw reported "the 'open minded' and 'tolerant' liberals ran down the aisles and across the pews, hoping against hope to catch a 'right winger' on tape daring to push back (none did).

"This is what we're up against," De Leeuw wrote. "Amidst worshiping congregants and following unifying prayers that our president-elect be granted wisdom as he prepares to lead our nation through difficult global, social and economic challenges, the Michigan left declared open war on peaceful churchgoers.

"Mount Hope, for the record, is an evangelical, Bible believing church whose members provide free 24-hour counseling, prayer lines, catastrophic care for families dealing with medical emergencies, support groups for men, women and children dealing with a wide variety of life's troubles, crisis intervention, marriage ministries, regular, organized volunteer work in and around the city, missions in dozens of countries across the globe, a construction ministry that has built over 100 churches, schools, orphanages and other projects all over the world and an in-depth prison ministry that reaches out, touches and helps the men and women the rest of society fears the most. They also teach respect for all human life and the Biblical sanctity of marriage as an institution between one man and one woman," De Leeuw wrote.

"The church's response? After things settled down, the blasphemy ended, the lewd props removed and the families safe from fear of additional men and women running into and past them the pastor took the stage and led the congregation in one more prayer ... not for retribution, or divine justice or a celestial comeuppance (that's what I'd have prayed for) but instead that the troubled individuals who'd just defiled the Lord's house, so full of anger and hate, would know Jesus' love in their lives and God's peace that exceeds human understanding," De Leeuw wrote.

His blog attracted dozens of comments, including one that said it was just as well the protesters hadn't picked his church. "It was well within the church members' rights to respond with non-lethal force to put an immediate end to this assault. It this happened in my house, I'd have every right to throw someone out a window or two."

In a statement posted on the Internet, Bash Back confirmed its "operatives" were in the service, "stood up, declared themselves [bleep], and began screaming loudly. … Another group threw over a thousand fliers to the entire … congregation. The fire alarm was pulled. Queers began making out in front of the pastor. And within a matter of minutes, everyone had evaded the guards and made their escapes."

The statement continued, "Let is be known: So long as bigots kill us in the streets, this pack of wolves will continue to BASH BACK!"

The report comes just a day after video documentation of pro-homosexual protesters in California challenging a 69-year-old woman to a fight because she was affirming the biblical perspective of homosexuality.
"This screaming and shouting, name-calling and pushing by homosexual activists is not unlike a small child throwing a fit because he doesn't get his way," said Randy Thomasson, chief of the Campaign for Children and Families, a leading California-based pro-family group. "The public is getting a clue that homosexual activists don't like democracy and are willing to trample anyone and anything that gets in their way."

California voters by nearly 53 percent to 47 percent last week adopted a state constitutional amendment limiting marriage to one man and one woman.
Thomasson also has issued an analysis and a challenge called "How Shall We Live Under President-Elect Obama?" in which he describes the "moral free fall" encompassing the United States.
"America's greatness has been in people's self responsiblity, strong work ethic, moral character and knowledge of the proper role of government. But now a majority of Americans don't have these virtues and don't vote according to moral standards," he said.
Learn about the intimidating tactics and brilliant marketing techniques being used by "gay rights" activists – read David Kupelian's controversial blockbuster, "The Marketing of Evil: How Radicals, Elitists, and Pseudo-Experts Sell Us Corruption Disguised as Freedom."

Gary Glenn, president of the American Family Association of Michigan and co-author of the Marriage Protection Amendment approved by Michigan voters in 2004, condemned the homosexual activist group's intimidation tactics. "We will alert churches statewide of this now close-to-home threat of disruption of their members' freedom to worship in peace and safety," Glenn said, "but this is not the first time in history Christians have faced persecution or threats of reprisal for standing for their faith and values."

He predicted Americans, "particularly people of strong religious faith, are not cowards" and would not "be bullied by emotional adolescents who disrespect private property, the rule of law, and anyone who dares hold opinions diverse from their own."

"We will pray for and offer help to those who have gender identity and same-sex attraction disorders, but Americans will continue to reject their attempts to overturn the will of the people and impose their disorders on our children and society at large," he said.

Glenn said AFA-Michigan will join the Catholic League in urging Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox to investigate the organized violation of the church's private property rights and the group's threat of future disruptions of worship services.

Catholic League president Bill Donohue today issued a statement condemning the group's actions and accusing the news media of failing to report it with the same intensity they routinely do complaints by homosexual activist groups.