The Clintons made $109 Million since Bill Clinton left office, and more than half was from "speeches". Is there something wrong with this picture? I still remember when rich Republicans bought General Eisenhower's book by the thousands, which they dumped, to help finance is campaign. Now, all you have to do is give an speech and the money flows. Why do they want to go back to the tiny sum paid to the President? Is there something wrong with this picture? She said she is not influenced by contributions, you mean the Lobby people are wasting their money? How can she run for office without their contributions? Is there something wrong with this picture? I guess, we are back to "Getting the Best President Money Can Buy"/