Obama and Reparations


Clayton
Clayton's picture

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
Here is a shocker for all the socialist supporters of Ob(s)ama. Barack supports repartions for blacks, it is part of his believe in Black Liberation Theology; a religious stance he shares with such notables as Farakan and Wright. Think I kid? Here is Barack's own words on the subject... "I think the reparation we need right here in South Carolina is investment, for example in our schools. I did a town hall meeting in Florence, South Carolina, in an area called the corridor of shame. They've got buildings that students are trying to learn in that were built right after the Civil War. And we've got teachers who are not trained to teach the subjects they're teaching and high dropout rates. We've got to understand that there are corridors of shame all across the country. And if we make the investments and understand that those are our children, that's the kind of reparation that are really going to make a difference in America right now." April 26, 2007, CNN debate.South Carolina, http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/23/debate.transcript/index.html SO white liberals prepare yourself to be guilty, to be ashamed, to bow your heads and pay, pay, PAY! Obama says that is what you deserve.
No votes yet

jankoski
jankoski's picture

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75
A socialist like Shay will come on here and say, "you don't think we should improve the quality of education on here?" Yet, they'll miss the whole point about reparations. Sorry, if I provided the obvious in advance, Cin.
Clayton
Clayton's picture

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
to apologize. I think we all know Shays well enough to guess his response. Clearly he will defend Obama into the depths of H*LL. The interesting point is that, if I remember correctly, in a preformat change discussion, he oppossed reparartions to the Japanese and to American Indians. Can you say double standard? And Roy Gursky is complaining that no one is posting anything interesting on the Board.
warhater
warhater's picture

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 227
Who’s Roy Gursky?
Clayton
Clayton's picture

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
of this board. http://forums.contracostatimes.com/topic/any-ideas-for-a-new-forum Roy Gursky is a Brentwood poster who uses this website to advertise his Fruit stand and objects to political controversy on this Board.  He is a member of the OFECS being a ver identifiable person in Brentwood who frequents a local cafe with the rest of his coffee drinking retiree buddies every day. OFEC is actually a local term used to refer to them, and really is not my invention-but if they are giving me credit so be it. Roy actually runs a pretty nice nut and fruit stand--but so do a lot of others in the Brentwood Byron area.
roygur
roygur's picture

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 566
I actually don't use this website to advertise our operation, other than to post our website as part of my poster signature. Folks don't have to click on that. I don't oppose political controversy, otherwise, why would I have started a forum about same-sex marriages? Criminey, Clayton, how much more politically controversial can you get? FYI, i do not frequent a local cafe, sipping coffee or anything else with other retirees or local farmers, and have not for at least ten years. OFEC certainly doesn't apply to them, never has. I'm not sure where you get your information, but, it is dated and wholly inaccurate. I'm not sure where the term OFEC came from, but it is recent, referring to Old Farts East County, and no, you shouldn't have credit for that; that was one of our other OFEC posters that should have credit, just can't remember who.  Thanks for the plug for our and other stands in the area. Harvest Time in Brentwood, Inc. and their member growers appreciate the kudos. www.harvest4you.com.  If you'd like to discuss my politics or any other issue with me, please e-mail me at gurskyranch@pacbell.net so we don't waste space here on the forums.... Roy Gursky http://gurskyranch.com
Clayton
Clayton's picture

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
I actually don't use this website to advertise our operation, other than to post our website as part of my poster signature.   Posting your website is advertisement. Describing what you sell is an advertisement.  I really do not care in your case because it is minimal, it is not repetitious and it is not the sole reason you use the Board. But it does bother me when other advertise events and causes, (and occasionally do so with multiple postings).  I don't oppose political controversy, otherwise, why would I have started a forum about same-sex marriages? Criminey, Clayton, how much more politically controversial can you get? You can get much more controversial then gay marriage--Is Obama a racist, is Iran's dictatorship a mimic of Hitler's Nazi Germany and do they provide the same level of danger--Is Bush guilty of war crimes--Are environmentalists responsible for the high price of gas, are Jews a race and should Israel exist, (these are just the topics I discussed this morning). Topics that people are passionate about are controversial, and it is not that people are not passionate about gay marriage, (yes I know the double meaning there), but people tend to be more passionate about other topics.  Not as engrossing as the best Barbeque place, or the some sort of film naming game--but some of us like political discussions.  Why do you shy away from discussing politics publicly? As for OFEC, I have been accused of creating the term, I did not but I am tired of saying that I did not, so blame me for it if you wished. I may have been the first to use it—but I heard it used in Brentwood at and EOC function several years ago, (actually by a fireman of all people).  I mentioned that I had heard of you from another poster and he confirmed who you were. He mentioned OFEC then.   The name seem to fit the attitude of that group of posters you seem to lead, (if anyone leads on a blog) so I used it. My opinion is that it still fits.  
shays
shays's picture

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 971
I'll leave local battles to you locals ... but trying to talk sense to Clayton's "opinions" is like talking to a wall.  Good luck.
madcali4nian
madcali4nian's picture

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 358
To the idea of reparations I give a wholeheartedly "HELL NO" and to the Obamination I say he is full of doo doo for even thinking that. If anyone deserves reparations it would be the blacks who were held in captivity until freed by Republican Lincoln, not this current generation who did not suffer like their ancestors did. My native American ancestors were treated just as bad, and they deserve reparations and not myself, but the problem is they are all dead. We may have done this for former Japanese Americans held in detention camps, but the thing about that is that there are still survivors from those days who deserve reparations. The country would go broke if these commie leftists like the Obamination were to have their way in this.
AFrank
AFrank's picture

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 90
Reparations are complete; equality has been restored when a black man and a white man can be selected to vie equally for the highest office and most powerful position in the USA (and frankly, the world).
Clayton
Clayton's picture

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
That Obama and the Black Liberation theology he represents does not agree with you. They want more and they want it from whites.
502PIR
502PIR's picture

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 134
If Obama wants and gets reperations for the abuses that all those white folks inflicted on his ancestors I would submit that he only get a half an acre and half a mule since he is half white.
madcali4nian
madcali4nian's picture

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 358
Half a mule?  I would say that he deserves the hind end of one.
Clayton
Clayton's picture

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
How many Black ( and guilt-ridden white) votes will Obama get by promising reparations to blacks? I really do not think the US can survive with him as President.
Kawigurl
Kawigurl's picture

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 201
I 100% agree... The US will not survive with the world in-tow.
warhater
warhater's picture

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 227
What do mean “with the world in tow”?
Kawigurl
Kawigurl's picture

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 201
That means with the world following America. If America is towing the world then what's meant by my statement is if America implodes, then the world will follow suit.
shays
shays's picture

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 971
Look around you.  America is already imploding ... Instead of cutting taxes (disproportionately favoring the most wealthy individuals in the country) and then cutting spending, we cut the revenue source and then increased the spending 10 fold!  For the past two years, the Democratic Congress has not passed any bill that it could not find revenue for from some other source (except the spendy Defense appropriations that the President continues to demand) ... because the Republican bloc of voters has not completely crumbled around this President, most of those efforts to deliver on the promises it made to get elected have gone down to defeat.  As a result, we have an unregulated financial market that spawned the bundled sub-prime mortgage -- making (again) a select group of individuals wealthy beyond their wildest dreams while destroying the lives of millions of middle- and working-class families and essentially bankrupting whatever reputable lending institutions were still standing -- only a major socialist government giveaway by the FED saved the day (though the crisis is still lurking right under the surface, and refuses to go away and be "solved"). As a result, we have an unregulated market in oil speculation ... again, a very small handful of individuals (you know ... people buying things they’ll never get from people that never had it, making money on both sides ... Will Rogers said that, not I) is growing incredibly wealthy at the expense of an entire country! while the price of other commodities spikes out of control. Other signs of implosion?  Collapsing bridges.  Major sinkholes popping up and engulfing entire towns, but mostly just pocking the nation's highways that are not being repaired.  Crumbling public buildings (schools, hospitals, libraries, etc.).  Anhauzer Busch being bought by a Brazilian firm, CGX being purchased by a London conglomerate representing Saudi interests.  Countless manufacturing jobs being shipped overseas -- even the armored humvees used in Iraq are now built in South Africa (even our military is being off-sourced).  Before World War II, the U.S. had something between 2000 and 3000 military planes in its entire arsenal ... by the end of the war, the number was in the hundreds of thousands.  Even though we are told we are in a war as significant and threatening as WWII, do you honestly think the US could produce that many airplanes, today?  What exactly can the great American manufacturing heartland crank out today? Where do all your kids' toys come from?  How about the ingredients for your pets' food?  How about the key ingredients for your pills and prescriptions (which cost 5x the amount the very same pills are available in other countries than they do here)?  How about the tomatoes that may (or may not) pass on salmonella to you? Talk about imploding?  Who is going to pay the credit card that Cheney and Company have been using for the past 7.5 years?  Will our grandchildren, when the bill comes due, refuse to pay "reparations" for YOUR sins in electing this group of thieves and con-men (who have distorted and misrepresented every bit of scientific evidence in their exclusive hands in order to sell and promote adoption of their policies, knowing that once the policies were in place, it wouldn't matter how much people screamed and howled and got a little incensed about how they had been misled). Who is following America, now?  China is passing us in so many areas of industrial production that it is supplanting us as the primary supplier of key commodities and more and more countries must address the demands of the Chinese ... and knuckle under to what it is that the Chinese want ... before ever thinking about voting alongside us or supporting us in yet another foolish and irresponsible piece of international intrigue.  Ten years ago, I think it was fairly safe to assume that as the U.S. went, so did the rest of the world.  I am not so sure that is the case any longer.  We do still consume a disproportionate amount of the world's stuff, but even that is changing as China's (and increasingly India's) hunger for consumer products increases. It didn't have to be that way.  Mismanagement did not have to be the overriding legacy of this administration ... though it is looking increasingly that way.  But then again, if you look at the history of Bush-led businesses, he never did have a very good management record. So, who's going to bail him out this time?  Certainly not John McCain ... who promises exactly a greater dose of the same economic approach.  Sorry, but the only alternative is a fresh one; a do-over (or a restart) is what America needs.   It is going to take a while to get us back on our feet.  And it won't be easy.  The sacrifices that George W said we didn't have to make (while we had our cake and ate it too) are now going to have to be made.  And they will have to be made by everyone ... not just the middle- and working-classes.  By sacrifice and hard work ... that is, giving up on some of the luxuries we consume because someone has convinced us that we have to have them, really cutting back on the grandiose giveaway of wealth to those at the center of the corporate world by reining in their salaries and benefits (in order to more equitably distribute that income amongst the people who actually produce the value), and paying off our debt the old-fashioned way ... I am confident America can bounce back from thirty years of Movement Conservative efforts to reinstitute the Gilded Age and regain its proud and shining spot in the pantheon of nations. Barack Obama is not necessarily going to do it; certainly not by himself. But he is a start.
Kawigurl
Kawigurl's picture

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 201
Yah for once, I really agree with you. America is imploding- and we don't lead anyone anymore. I'd still like to think we're clinging to that, though... we still haven't gone as far as to say that our country is a 3rd world [bleep]... we're much more ahead than a LOT of other countries, even still. Really now, don't even talk about reparations with me anymore. The whole idea is non-progressive and ASININE. Enough said.
Clayton
Clayton's picture

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
the defining difference between the candidates.  McCain is running on a platform of maintaining the standard of living for all Americans, and expanding the economy. Obama is running on a platform of reducing everyone's standard of living, (with elitist exceptions of course) and reducing the size and robustness of our economy.   McCain is proposing a plan of doing no harm, whereas Obama is planning to harm everyone because, hey, as Pastor Wright said, America deserves it.  If you want America to be less then it currently is, if you enjoy living on less; then vote for Obama because that is precisely what he is promising you, unless your are Black, of course.
shays
shays's picture

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 971
McCain is running on a platform of maintaining the standard of living for all Americans, and expanding the economy. "Expanding the economy for everyone"?????  How in the world does he propose to do that?  Oh yeah, make the Bush tax cuts permanent.  That sure worked wonders over the past 7.5 years, didn't it?  The price of oil was going to go down after we invaded Iraq, wasn't it (just ask Dick Cheney)?  Income from that oil production was going to pay for the reconstruction of Iraq, wasn't it (just ask Donald Rumsfeld)?  "American" corporate leaders were going to take all those massive tax cuts and invest them in new businesses to create new jobs and better wages and a better standard of living for all Americans, weren't they (just ask George W. Bush)? Instead, they used the profits (since when do Americans profiteer from a war?) to buy up their own stock, and then they invested what was left over ... in China! ... in Brazil! ... in Thailand!  Sure they built new factories and created new jobs ... in Burma! ... in Mexico! ... in Taiwan! These are the same policies that John McCain voted for 95% of the time, and these are the same policies he proposes now.  Let's hear it for a high standard of living in America ... for the 2% who can afford to live here and buy bread, eggs, chicken, cars, gasoline or just about anything else that is rapidly being priced out of reach of almost all Americans! Obama is running on a platform of reducing everyone's standard of living, (with elitist exceptions of course) and reducing the size and robustness of our economy. No ... you read things incorrectly, again!  Barack Obama is not going to reduce anyone's standard of living, but he is going to take back the tax breaks that George Bush gave to America's richest people and make them contribute to the disappearing well-being of everyone else.  Ok, so George Soros (ironic how I picked his name from the mix, huh?) has to give up one trip to the Swiss Alps and maybe has to not buy one more stretch humvee.  Gosh.  How many of the 98% of Americans NOT making the billions of dollars a year that he makes thing that this truly is a "hardship", or that his reduction in standard of living is worth writing home about?  As to the economy ... new, small, independent, robust and creative businesses will thrive under Barack Obama.  Big Oil gives up all its tax breaks and has to compete in a "free market", and the money thus collected is used to support start-up businesses manufacturing solar cells, hydrogen converters, magnetic motors, architectural designers utilizing new technologies, construction firms installing them, auto makers adopting them, etc etc and voila!  There is a vibrant, energetic, productive economy blasting the cobwebs off the old f*rts who can only see business as usual as a thing to do. McCain is proposing a plan of doing no harm, whereas Obama is planning to harm everyone because, hey, as Pastor Wright said, America deserves it.  McCain's proposals are going to harm foreigners (but you don't give a flying fig about any of them, unless they are Jewish), harm old folks who cannot afford health care, harm young children stuck in the test and punish public school system George W created, harm women who lose the right to choose, harm working-class Americans whose jobs are shipped overseas and for whom the New Deal safety net has been effectively destroyed by Republicans, harm any poor soul who gets ratted on for any reason in a foreign country because he can expect to have electrodes attached to his testicles until he screams uncle ... The Reverend Wright is a figment of your racist imagination ... if he hadn't said what he said, you'd have invented it (which you do, anyway).  Get off of the Reverend Wright ... as Barack Obama has done.
Kawigurl
Kawigurl's picture

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 201
Check it everyone! Worth the 13 minutes of your time if you're going to vote in the presidential elections. EVERY ASPECT OF THE CANDIDATES LIVES SHOULD BE DEEPLY SCRUTINIZED. Keep that in mind before you defend them.... these ppl might be president! http://www.eyeblast.tv/Public/Video.aspx?rsrcID=2036 Bye bye World..... our will our hope still hold on?
shays
shays's picture

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 971
I watched the first five minutes of this hit piece, and that was all I had to see.  I have more important things to do than watch recycled rumors, lies, parsed & clipped video "evidence" that there are "questions" we need to ask ourselves of Barack Obama.  Turn the tables and imagine your reaction if you watched a 13-minute video about John McCain that took all the stupid, malapropriate, hateful things he has said and strung just them together to support some claim that we need to know "everything about him" before we vote.  What if "John Sidney McCain III" was portrayed as say ... a foreign "Australian" name, with implications that he owed his primary allegiance to kangaroos and koalas? ... or the "III" was emphasized to suggest upper crust fantasies?  What if allusions were dropped that Cindy Lou Hensley was a junior drag rodeo queen or the distributing company she inherited had mob allegiances?  What if this video then portrayed John McCain as a philandering cheater who had multiple extra-marital affairs during his first marriage (including at least one out-of-wedlock black son ... this according to no more reliable a source than Karl Rove himself), and forced his wife to sign divorce papers while she was recovering from a near fatal car accident? Need I say more?  This is the level of "fact" provided in the video I attempted to watch.  It is insulting, it is disgusting, and it is plain b*ll[bleep].  There is just enough truth in each of the "FACTS" as to warrant mentioning (just as there are actually more than enough facts regarding Mr. McCain's background to warrant mentioning) ... but so what? The first three minutes of the video are devoted to telling us his name.  The next charge, which involved playing a selected clip from a primary debate, lingered on the accusation that he did not vote, but didn't bother to show his response, did it?   In fact, every single "charge" (every one so far discredited, rebutted or explained, by the way) in the first five minutes did not offer one scrap of objectivity or rebuttal or contradictory evidence -- for which there is plenty. You really need to begin questioning blatantly one-sided arguments ...  ... they may, in fact, be correct.  But it is always wise to at least listen to the other side of every argument before you invest yourself in the one you "like"; one-sided arguments cannot lose if the listener does not know there are alternatives.
warhater
warhater's picture

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 227
What a beautiful in-depth profile of a candidate, so well researched and presented that it might qualify for a George Polk Award for Journalism. It sometimes staggers the imagination how the media plums the depths of aggregated excrement to produce films for people such as yourself to pick up and fling at the rest of us. I hope you didn’t get any on you.
warhater
warhater's picture

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 227
Maintain the standard of living for whom? Listen man the US is approaching bankruptcy and McCain ain’t gonna change it by furthering the Bush policy of depleting US resources to a war for the enrichment of the few at the expense of the many. Because the US taxpayer is the fiduciary of the World Bank and the International Monetary fund the US is allowed to print fiat money. Money that needs no more backing than the US Congress to be printed; It’s boiling down to ‘where’s the beef’ to back that money and the beef is in China: Where do you come up with such a rosy picture of our economy that McCain will somehow preserve?  
warhater
warhater's picture

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 227
Same posting twice. Sorry        
warhater
warhater's picture

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 227
Justice requires reparations for wrongdoings committed. The reparation (paying back what you owe) can come in many different forms. It can come as a sentence to prison or it can come in the form of restitution. If whites do not pay the reparation then who will pay? There were a few blacks that owned slave but most slave owners were white. Should the blacks not be paid for the genesis of white wealth they helped create? I might go on to say that the interest on white wealth should be paid as well. It would be enough to send every Negro in America to the best high schools and colleges America has to offer thereby eliminating the need for affirmative action programs. It would also allow every Negro to own land and property just like Whitey.   I would go so far as to say that your white privilege has jaded your opinion on the matter and that indeed it is you that holds the royal flush to win the highest award for racism.
Kawigurl
Kawigurl's picture

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 201
You're ridiculous. That idea is just insane! The idea of reparations is so asinine. If that were to happen, people would be receiving things that their ANCESTORS would have deserved, NOT them. The whites of today did nothing to deserve giving reparations to the BLACKS of today. It's silly. Why should WE pay for something WE didn't do? Just like they can't help being born BLACK, we can't help being born WHITE, so that's inequality again right there. Just because we were born white means we automatically owe something to the blacks because of what our white ancestors did. And mind you, not all white people back then had slaves, so how do you go and figure out what white families are EXEMPT? Do you really believe the b/s that comes out of your mouth? My god! I for one would REFUSE to pay. I already resent the fact my tax money goes to people who are undeserving. And those people  are a muriad of races - In CA, probably most receiving that $$ are Hispanic.  
shays
shays's picture

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 971
Let me ask you this:  Are you willing to help pay the bill that George W. Bush has worked up to fund his little war in Iraq?  Who do you think is going to get stuck paying it?  Do you think there is any chance at all that the entire bill is going to be passed on to my children and grandchildren?  Do you think anyone is going to give a rat's behind who incurred the bill when its turn comes due?  Do you honestly believe that my children and grandchildren will be excused from paying that bill because "they" didn't create it? Now, in this particular case of "reparations" ... I personally do not believe that cash settlements based on descent from slaves is a good way to go.  I do, however, agree with Barack Obama that for generations after the Civil War, long after the abolition of slavery, black Americans were still discriminated against in many different ways -- some of it encoded in law that did not end until the 1970s, some of it enshrined in behaviors and actions that technically were not illegal but had the same result (preferences in hiring, housing, lending, and law enforcement, for example) ... and some of it still in place today.  The "halls of shame" to which Barack Obama are not all black en[bleep]es of poverty and neglect, but a large number of them are.  But I agree that egregious discrimination and unequal treatment is not just a thing of the "past", practiced by our white ancestors.  We have failed miserably in investing in our local communities, or -- more specifically -- in core parts of almost all communities.  It is time that we ended that, and stop sending all the bright and best and shiniest new stuff (and people) to the favored communities (because they can afford it), and began investing equitably in all communities.
Kawigurl
Kawigurl's picture

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 201
Look... nobody likes to pay bills. Nobody is willing. But we will all have to, that's a fact. It is what it is! There's no point in screaming about it, it had to be done. I don't like paying my gas bill, but I pay it in full every month. I like good credit and the rewards I get for having good credit. BUT- I know other people who don't pay their bills, and guess what? They're black, hispanic, indian... so, just because now they are in a tight spot, and because in some way or another they feel repressed, wronged by whites, or their ancestors surely were.... does that mean they deserve my hard earned money? HELL NO!!! Another thing Shays- black people are among some of the most racist people I know. I can't tell you how many times I've walked down the street and passed a group of them, only to be threatened and ridiculed because I'm a little white girl. They focus more on race than anyone I know. I myself, don't notice it unless you make a specticle of yourself, and represent all the bad things and cliches about that particular ethnicity. I have some REALLY GREAT black friends- but like I've always said there are exceptions to every rule. Reparations, like I've said before, any way you want to package it, is asinine. To re-pay a specific race of people is just idiotic. It's the opposite of progress. It will cause more problems than it will fix- people will be resentfull and even MORE racist than before...  What we need to do is get off our lazy [bleep] and actually MAKE this country and our neighborhoods good places to live. Not BILL WHITEY FOR IT, when these PEOPLE have made their neighborhoods a bad place to live ALL BY THEIRSELVES. We as a COMMUNITY, as a STATE, COUNTRY... we all need to step in and make the difference. All of us. Don't put the BLAME and subsequently place the bill on white people! That's soooo stupid! Plus, how do you possibly divy that out? There are half blacks, 1/4 blacks, half black half white... are those people going to have to pay half and then recieve half back??? What a horrible idea! It would cost so much money and waste so much time to actually make that happen in a manner deemed fair (well, by SOME at least...)... I've seen exemplary black people in my life rise to greatness of their own accord. You think they did that by receiving reparations from white folk? NO!! And that is why those black families in my example are so PROUD of who they are. They are wonderful people, people who I could only dream of becoming... hardworking, learned, great people. Reparations will do nothing but add fuel to the already burning fire of racism. We already have enough problems, why prod? Bye bye World..... our will our hope still hold on?
shays
shays's picture

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 971
You raise good points and feel strongly about injustice and unfairness.  You say you carry your load, and I have no reason to doubt your word.  It seems that you try to get along with others, are forgiving of others trespasses, and are willing to lend a hand to those who truly need it.  I know you cannot look me in the eye and see that I mean what I am saying, but believe me when I tell you that I mean what I just said, and in no way mean to be condescending or patronizing. But just as assuredly as I say that, I can tell that you missed the point of my question.  I have no reason to suspect that you do not pay your bills, and will meet the obligations of your choices.  But that is not what I was asking.  I was simply pointing out that there is no way on earth that we are going to repay the trillions of dollars borrowed to wage a war and rebuild Iraq in the next six months.  The bill is going to come due on someone else's watch, isn't it?  And the bill is so mind-bogglingly large that there is no way that you or I are going to pay it off during our lifetimes.  Not that I can see. So the point is that the things that WE did (whether we agreed or not, whether it was our choice or not) are going to fall upon future generations to pay off. According to your argument, that bill is NOT their responsibility because they did not incur it.  According to your argument, they do not have to make reparations for the borrowed money (which becomes stolen money once it goes into default and no one steps forward to make good on it) because it wasn't them that borrowed it.  That's sort of like saying that if you inherit a house that still has a mortgage on it from your deceased parents, you are not responsible for paying off the balance of the mortgage.  I'm sorry, but it doesn't work that way. Now, it looks like you and I (at least) are in agreement that direct cash payments to black Americans for crimes committed in the 19th century are counterproductive and essentially unfair.  Had racial discrimination and all the social injustice and inequity that accompanies it also ended with the abolition of slavery, the case would be closed. But it didn't, did it?  And if you honestly think that black people have the same opportunity as the majority of white people in this country, maybe you are lucky and live in an enlightened neighborhood where such equity has been reached.  Myself, I just don't see it.  I look at differences in rates of employment, of salary scales and income, of rates of incarceration, of lifespan and opportunities for health coverage, and still see rather glaring disparities. Do groups of black people intimidate individual white people, or groups of white people?  Unfortunately, you are absolutely correct.  Racism is a two-way street.  Your observations are simple corroboration of the fact that we still have a long way to go ... in your mind, black people (especially young, black males) need to be a lot more respectful and make a much more sincere effort to show that they accept white folk.  In my mind, someone growing up in south-central Los Angeles already has at least one strike against them the moment they enter kindergarten.  In either case, the issue is not dead, or resolved.
Kawigurl
Kawigurl's picture

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 201
You're right- we are absolutely not going to be paying that war-debt in our lifetime... I have no idea how the US will be able to "right" this in the future... we don't have any way of paying our bills now (as a country) and as time and interest is tacked on, we will always inevitably be in the hole. That is why looking to the future is so scary to me- because it's like, "How?!" Trust me, if I had the opportunity to change things so that our children wouldn't have to pay the bill, I would. But it's just something that comes with living and being a part of this country. Having citizens pay down the road for bills their ancestors incurred as a country, for the country (ie; war, to keep America safe).... isn't the same as paying reparations to citizens, from other citizens. I know I don't have to explain that to you. It's just a different concept to me. In my mind and in my opinion, we did what we did- we paid for it with the civil war, and we've still been paying for slavery and what our white ancestors did to the african americans they brought over in other ways. Slavery is in the past. Racism is the current and unfortunately, the future. Racism exists solely because as long as there are different people living in the same area, there's going to be hate. There's just no stopping it. Middle eastern people here are faced with I think more racism today than any other group because of what's going on right now. But do I expect to later pay reparations to those US citizens who might have been affected by that because of their origin? No... it's a war. I guess I just don't get reparations. Lets say we annihilate the Middle East. Are we just going to feel bad about it and spend more money giving back to them because "Oops, sorry about that.... yaaaahhhh, we did some shi**.... here ya go. Are we cool now? No? Ok, here's more... take care Middle East!" What ever happened to just winning a war and calling it good? Anyway- about racial discrimination... every race is discriminated against. Let's take white dsicrimination for example. There are a lot of state and private benefits I can't take part in because I'm not a "minority". Although, if you look around in CA, white is becoming the minority! Anyhow, blacks have "Black Student Union Clubs" in school. The moment a white person starts a "White Pride" club, it becomes racist. But the other clubs (Aloha Club, BSU, etc...) they're just being proud of their heritage. Yah, well I'm proud too! I can't get a hold of certain scholarships. Because if there was a "white student" scholarship, it'd be racist.... you can see where I am going with this. The fact is we live in a melting pot. And it just is the way it is. People choose their own destiny. A very close friend of mine was telling me the other day, "Situations are created by people. Any situation you find yourself in is your own fault. Where you are today is a product of a series of choices and decisions you've made, and the way you've reacted to stimulis in your environment. We choose our own destiny, we have almost complete control." I have no idea how hard it is to be black. But the fact is that many black people find themselves in jail and committing crimes for the same reasons anyone else does- because they choose to do so. These kinds of people often don't have a chance from birth. Their ghetto mammas think it's cute for lil Tyrese to act like a thug, and they grow up with that encouragement to be "bad". They think they have to be and act "tough" to get ahead. Nobody ever taught them any different. I feel bad for them, yes. But- they made the choice. It's just sad because it's how they have been conditioned. So, I guess that is where you get sympathy out of me. . . from bad parenting. :) Thanks for the kind words! I really appreciate it. It's nice to finally have a conversation about touchy subjects with someone who can remain calm and not attack me personally. Thanks! Bye bye World..... our will our hope still hold on?
warhater
warhater's picture

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 227
Just for the record it was not Obama that called for reparations it was his pastor Reverend Wright whom Obama distanced himself from, but I will continue the argument for reparations because it would be the right thing to do.   Reparations are not an insane idea if taken in the context of passing on wealth to a family member or private organization after ones death. I might also add that there were black landowners as far north as Arkansas that were driven from their homes and farms in the early twentieth century by whites wherein the land was put up for sale as abandoned by the local governments and the new owners were issued deeds. The white families that became the new owners are living on that land today as we speak and God knows were the black families that were driven away live. As part of reparations the titles to those lands should be searched and the black families that owned it prior to the whites should be paid for that ‘stolen land’ or the whites made to vacate it and let the original black owners return. That would be a good start.
Kawigurl
Kawigurl's picture

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 201
Completely asinine. Enough said. I'm not even wasting my time defending my stance on this one!   Bye bye World..... our will our hope still hold on?
warhater
warhater's picture

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 227
I doubt you waste much time on anything other than right wing idiots on TV.    
Kawigurl
Kawigurl's picture

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 201
And here we go with the personal insults. Is that all you got? Seriously? And no, I don't watch TV, LET ALONE crap that has to do with politics. And I'm not right wing. You can say all you want about me being ignorant, it still doesn't make it true. That happens to be an opinion, buddy. Bye bye World..... our will our hope still hold on?
madcali4nian
madcali4nian's picture

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 358
YOU GO GIRL!!! Tell that Leftwing elitist how it is.   
Kawigurl
Kawigurl's picture

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 201
LOL! Bye bye World..... our will our hope still hold on?
warhater
warhater's picture

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 227
You call my opinion asinine and then worry about me calling you an idiot? Get real.
Kawigurl
Kawigurl's picture

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 201
To call you opinion stupid or asinine is not really a personal insult. If I called you ugly and old that would be a personal insult. So yah... it's time to er, get reaaaallll. Watching too much Dr. Phil? Bye bye World..... our will our hope still hold on?
shays
shays's picture

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 971
You have your rumormill radar ears turned on "high", don't you?
Kawigurl
Kawigurl's picture

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 201
Obama supporters- how can you look up to someone to lead you into the future when Obama is obviously stuck in the PAST!!!??? Reparations are the last thing Americans should have to deal with, and we never should have in the first place. If I'm not mistaken, there was a civil war about that where a lot of people (White Americans too!) that died for the cause. If Obama gets voted in (unlikely) then I'm moving. I don't want any part of the America he will "lead". It will only continue it's downspiral...
Clayton
Clayton's picture

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
If  Obama wins, (I know that would be a gag fest), then we need all sane hands on board to fight back.   Remember, once Obama strikes out at his loyal defenders by taxing them into poverty, and taking away their private property; then conservatives will be needede to rebuild the government he destroyed. The one good thing that could happen is such an awful president might once and for all prove why Democrats are unsuited for public office.
Kawigurl
Kawigurl's picture

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 201
Hahaha- Amen to that! But if Obama wins, I can see it actually coming down to a fight for all humankind. And no, I'm not a right-wing radical by ANY means- so stop your comments from coming out before you even think them! I actually have NEVER EVER been interested in politics.... until this. But what I mean in specific is, maybe not in his term as president, maybe not in 20 or thirty years... but if Obama wins, we'll be in an unseen and unrecognized war with Islamic radicals. What it'll come down to is the people trying to win back our freedom! AGAIN! With all the gun laws and regulations coming, it's time to arm-up people...
Kawigurl
Kawigurl's picture

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 201
Hahaha- Amen to that! But if Obama wins, I can see it actually coming down to a fight for all humankind. And no, I'm not a right-wing radical by ANY means- so stop your comments from coming out before you even think them! I actually have NEVER EVER been interested in politics.... until this. But what I mean in specific is, maybe not in his term as president, maybe not in 20 or thirty years... but if Obama wins, we'll be in an unseen and unrecognized war with Islamic radicals. What it'll come down to is the people trying to win back our freedom! AGAIN! With all the gun laws and regulations coming, it's time to arm-up people...
shays
shays's picture

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 971
Hmmm ... I thought we already were in a war with radical Muslims?  Somehow, that bigger war seems to have gotten bogged down in a civil war between a Sunni minority and a Shi'a majority, and a larger conflict between two gangsta-like Shi'a families.  Whatever did happen to that organization that succeeded in avoiding whatever security measures were (or were not) in place at the beginning of the current Administration and successfully carried out a rather dramatic act of terror in this country?  And what was that organization called?  Who initially armed and trained it, back in the days when the term "muhajadeen" referred either to a freedom fighter against the Soviet invaders of Afghanistan, or to a character in a Frank Herbert novel?  Oh, and while on a "thirty-year" timeline ... just who was it that gave sophisticated weaponry (including the beginnings of a nuclear technology) to the mullahs of Iran -- under the table because trade with them was verbotten -- and then laundered the illegal cash through Saudi Arabia in order to buy off Central American death squads ... the same guys who threw nuns out of helicopters for sport and who are rumored to have been the fences for Columbian cocaine smuggled into San Diego, LA, San Francisco, Portland and Seattle at the same time ... all in order to overthrow a popularly elected leader in a neighboring country and which had been expressly ruled "illegal" by the Congress of the United States? Looks like the troubles and the timeline are already in place?
warhater
warhater's picture

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 227