Saturday was opening day for Pittsburg’s Little League Baseball season. As a doting Grandma, I dutifully carried all my camera gear to the Grandson’s Opening Day Parade and first game. His coach was happy that I was taking pictures of everyone. I video taped the parade and waited around until his game later that day.
His first game started and, naturally, he was at the bottom of the line up. He also did not have a field position. Okay, out of 12 kids they can’t all be on the field and my grandson is new to the team. Some things you have to earn. The opposing team was more practiced and seemed (to me) to be made up of older children. Of course my grandson’s team was losing miserably. That didn’t seem to bother them too much though, they were just excited to play. I video taped each batter as they came to the plate so I could put together a little show to put on YouTube. One player wanted to link the file to her MySpace page.
As the batters went through the roster, I realized that we seemed to have gone around the list at least once and there were still 3 kids who had not been up to bat – my grandson being one of them. I stopped taping.
At the end of the 3rd inning, the 3 benchwarmers finally got field positions. During their next at-bat, another kid got to bat a second time and then the benchwarmers got a turn. One benchwarmer got up to the plate and my grandson took the warm-up box. After the 2nd batter was called out, the coaches called the game. I never got to see my grandson bat while the coach’s kid and most of the others batted twice.
After the game I asked the coach why there were 3 kids who never got to bat. He “explained” that this is just the way it was set up and since they called the game due to the huge mismatch in skills, he didn’t get to have everyone up to bat. He told me they had 16 at-bats and it’s just too bad that the game was called as my grandson came up. When I pointed out that there are only 12 kids on the team, with 16 at-bats, logic dictates that all the kids should have had a turn. He insisted that this is just the way it goes, using the time-worn fall-back statement “if you don’t like the way I coach, you get out here and coach your own team”; the same kind of statement everyone uses when they are wrong and they know it. This guy didn’t volunteer out of the goodness of his heart or because he wants to help kids enjoy the game – as he would have me believe – but to get his own kid a private team.
And then the coach wonders why these 3 benchwarmers have no enthusiasm for the team. It's because there isn't a "team", there's the coach's kid, his kid's friends and the benchwarmers; three separate, distinct groups that don't intermix.
So what lesson are these 3 kids learning? I was under the impression that in little league, everyone got to play regardless of skill or familial status. I am disgusted to find that this is not true. The coach is teaching these kids that you have to be related to someone or know someone in order to play. Skill or desire to play has no place here. There should be some hard fast rules to coaching kids and the coaches should be held accountable. I don’t care if they volunteer for the job. They should be required to be fair and ethical. If I had paid $200+ for my kid to play, and he sat on the bench the entire time, I would be demanding an explanation from the people who organize Little League in Pittsburg.
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 76
I am so disgusted by the behavior that you just described. These type of activities are supposed to be all about uplifting the skill as well as confidence of EVERY child out there. I have noticed that in youth sports there are a few coaches that don't seem to get that. A win at all costs mentallity is definitely not what I want my kid to take from their experience. They should learn fundamentals and technique and strategy and all that good stuff. They should also have a coach who is an example in integrity, sportsmanship and TEAMWORK. I would approach the board and see if you could make some type of official complaint. My kids' sport is football and the board at that organization is proactive in keeping the communication doors open to any and all who have concerns. Everyone's focus is the children. Not sparing the ego of the coach that may be in need of some constructive criticism.
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2
I don't want to get into good and bad coaches, because we could go on for hours regarding that. I want to give all of you a little background on Little League Play Time Rules. The play time rule for Little League is every kid during the regular season must get 6 defensive outs and 1 at bat per game unless the game is shortened for any reason. Now, each seperate league can go stricter than this but not softer than this rule.
You also must realize if your grandson is in the Majors division, that division only bats 9 players at a time and depending on where in the lineup he is put in when he does get in the game that there might be several batters that get two at bats before he gets one. In the minors division every kid that shows up to the game on time must be in the lineup. It is a continuos batting order. So in other words not one player will get a second at bat before every player that is at that game and on time gets his or her first at bat. In this division it is free substitution into the field, so a coach can play the kids every other inning and not worry about the batting lineup.
Some leagues say every kid has to get 9 defensive outs, and some say they don't care if the game is shortened the kids must get there play time. If the home team is ahead by more than 10 runs the game only has to go 3 and a half innings and if the visiting team is ahead by more than 10 runs the game has to go 4 complete innings and if either scenario is the case the game will be called at the respective time.
I don't know Pittsburgs in house rules, but it sounds like the coach did try and get everyone in this paticular game. It also sounds like, from your side of the story that he didn't explain it the best possible way to you. If you aren't happy, I suggest you contact the Board of Directors for Pittsburg and have them look into it as that is why they are there.
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 462
It seems to me that the main reason your grandson didn't bat was the game only lasted 3 or 4 innings. The coach played his first string then rotated the rest of the members into the game (which is fair) but ran out of time. When one team leads the other by 15 runs, then the umpire calls the game. I'm sure your grandson will get other opportunities. It's important that all members play.
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4
Ha good luck. Been there, done that. Chances are your situation will improve little if any through out the year. My experience has been that only 5-10% of the little league coaches actually belong as coaches. The rest are worthless and here's why. Obviously there are exceptions but here is what I have experienced. Parents coach little league teams to ensure that their kids get the best positions and the most playing time. It's not right but I am personally willing to tolerate it. They put in a lot of time. Once they are coaching a team, and their kid is on it, they want ensure that the team is a winning team. I am not ok with this. Little League is supposed to be about fun. Most LL teams have three coaches or three parents involved. That leaves 6 positions left for the remaining 9 kids on the team to share. The coach had better use those positions wisely to ensure that all kids get fair playing time and a chance to have fun. Rarely does this happen. It is no fun to sit on the bench all the time.
Have you ever noticed that very VERY few Little Leagues give the parents the playing time rules at the beginning of the season? Why? Because they DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW. Little League has a serious problem with todays coaches and they are doing nothing to fix things. Thanks Little League! Some leagues have a rule that every kid must play three consecutive innings in the field and get at least one at bat. Know why this rule is in place? Because of bad coaches who never looked up the words fun and fair in the dictionary.
Like you said, when a parent asks or complains about ANYTHING, the standard response is "If you don't like it volunteer yourself. I think this even comes from Little League headquarters. Why do I need to volunteer? Just so that I can bring a little of the unfairness my way? Not! Everyone knows when they hear this answer, it's because the coach is WRONG. It's a joke.
I don't ask very much of coaches. I couldn't care less how much they know about baseball. I couldn't care less about the won-loss record. The only thing I care about is fairness and most Little League coaches get a BIG F in this area.
Thanks Little League!
Please keep us updated!
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14
Lindamermaid. First of all, I feel for what you went through. Your grandson undoubtedly felt the pain. Kids want to play, they want to participate and they want to be part of the team. Sitting on the bench without even having the chance to bat is unacceptable. Most kids do not care if they won or lost, they want to play and have a snack after the game.
Not having coached in Pittsburg, I do not know what the local rules are; however, I have coached elsewhere and the rule typically is that all kids will bat, with the last batter hitting before the first batter hits a second time. Check with the league. Also, kids have to play the field at some point during the first 3 innings. The reason I did volunteer to coach was because of some of the things you have mentioned. Some of the teams we played had their best players playing infield the whole game. What about the other kids!!
When I coached I did the following (for whatever its worth): Develped one lineup. I kept track of this and the player that was next to hit when the game ended was first the next game. This way almost everyone had the same number of at bats. This was strictly my philosophy. Even my assistant questioned it...but most of the parents loved it! I let every kid pitch to at least one batter during the year. Also, everyone played infield and outfield. The parents who were the most grateful were those who had kids that had lesser talent than the others. My philosophy was fundamentals, team work, and fun. Winning was never a high priority.
Lastly I was able to coach the all-star game that year and I played everyone where ever they wanted to play mixing up the team. One of the kids from another team told me, "I never got to play infield this year". One parent came up to me after the game and said he was glad his son got to play first base, he told me "you just made my season". Although these comments were positive, it made me realize some coaches want to win at all costs, even to the detriment of the kids. BTW, my son was treated just like any other kid on the team...and he was ok with that.
good luck.
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 137
LindaMermaid:
Based on what you've written, I'm not sure you understood what the coach meant when he said they had 16 at bats. I believe he was talking about the particular game in question. Because of the so-called "mercy rule", the game was stopped prior to its regular completion. Had the game continued, he was telling you that your grandson would indeed have gotten his turn to play. Because the game didn't finish normally, the coach didn't have a chance to play all his kids. There are ways around this, but most coaches who are under the "all play" rule wait until the last two innings of a game to play their backups. I actually don't agree with that method (In competitive "all play" leagues, I have always played my "benchwarmers" first and then pulled them after their two innings and their at bats), but it is the most common used.
You state the coach here was "... wrong and he knew it..." He was NOT wrong. You may disagree with him, but you both have your OPINIONS; neither is right or wrong. You also commented on his motivation for coaching. Unless you can read his mind, or he has said something specific to backup your assertion, you can't honestly say why he is coaching. You MAY be right; but as a High School and youth coach myself, I seriously doubt it. I'm not naive enough to believe that there aren't youth coaches out there operating under questionable motives; I know there are and I've seen them personally. But, from what I read in your account, this coach doesn't seem like he fits that particular mold.
You then made a comment about the coach wondering why the "benchwarmers" have no enthusiasm for the team. Did HE ask this question of you, or did you assume that this was on his mind? Almost every youth coach has a kid on their team, regardless of the sport. I was an exception to this rule as my own son wanted nothing to do with athletics while growing up. However, if that's what you believe is causing the problem, then I would seriously suggest you find other activities for your grandson. From my experience, I don't think you can avoid it in youth sports.
So what lesson are these 3 kids learning?
The lesson they are hopefully learning is that in order to compete in sport (and in life), one needs to train and work hard and, as you stated earlier in your comments, earn the spot. Not everyone can be the star baseball player, just like not everyone can be the star computer programmer or the star salesperson. The idea is to get the most out of yourself. Sometimes your most isn't as much as someone else's.
You state that there should be some hard and fast rules for coaching kids and that the coaches should be held accountable. If this league is part of the National Little League; I believe that there ARE hard and fast rules. I haven't coached Little League for a number of years, but when I did, there were two games a week. Each player was required to play AT LEAST two innings in the field for EVERY game and was required to get AT LEAST one at bat a week (or every two games). When I played and coached, we didn't have a "Mercy Rule", so I can't tell you what affect that has on the above rules I mentioned. I HOPE that it doesn't change them.
Justamom1:
Your points are well made and well taken, but for every parent like yourself, there are two who support and promote the "win at all cost" mentality. As a youth coach, frankly if I had my way, I would BAN ALL PARENTS from attending their kids’ games. At a minimum, perhaps an isolated sound-proof room from where they could watch the games. Your comments about the activity being in place to "uplift the skill as well as the confidence of EVERY child out there" is a well-intended and noble pursuit. If you have found a league where this is taking place, then NEVER leave it, because they are few are far between.
Bill2424:
It is with you that I take the greatest offense. Your experience is that only 5-10% of Little League coaches actually belong as coaches? That's a brilliant comment that has no ability to be proven or not. Let me ask you a question; Have YOU ever volunteered to coach youth sports? Or are you one of the millions of parents that just sit back and complain about the so-called inability of your kids’ coaches. You comment that parents coach to ensure that their kids get the best positions and the most playing time. I can tell you from PERSONAL EXPERIENCE that you are DEAD WRONG about this. I have known literally DOZENS of Mom's & Dad's that have volunteered their time and watched their own kids as backups. Several of my own assistants over the years have been the parents of kids in the exact same situation as described in the original post.
I challenge your comment that VERY few Little Leagues give parents the playing time rules at the beginning of the season. First of all, just HOW MANY Little Leagues have YOU personally been involved with? As a career youth and HS coach, I have been involved with 8 personally. ALL EIGHT handed out the league rules, INCLUDING rules about playing time at the time of SIGN UP. You say that SOME leagues have a rule; get it right - ALL national little leagues have a playing time rule. It's been there since I played as a kid more than 40 years ago!
HDohm:
Thanks for your insight. It sounds to me as though your youth coaching experience is more recent than my own. I've focused on HS coaching for a number of years now and have been removed from youth coaching for a while.
You are certainly right in that there are coaches who stress winning more than they should, especially at the younger youth levels.
ALL:
I've experienced for years, the vitriol about coaches and how terrible they are and what a horrible job that they do with kids. And, yes, some qualify. But it's my experience that MOST are volunteering because they CARE about the kids. It's interesting that if you volunteer for a charitable organization or for a fund raising event, you are lauded as a great and wonderful person. But if you coach a youth sport, you have a dozen or more parents berating you, telling you how things REALLY need to be. It is a thankless and difficult task. Except for the kids. If you are a good coach, those kids will stand by you forever. And that's why I continue coaching. I've seen coaches physically attacked, verbally abused and some very good coaches have left because of the behavior of parents. And THAT is a MUCH bigger problem than any assumed poor coaching. So when a coach says, "if you don't like it, volunteer and coach yourself", it's not because he "knows he's wrong". It's because he's tired. He's tired of fighting a seemingly never ending battle with parents who CLAIM they know better but are unwilling to actually GET INVOLVED.
As a High School coach I wrote the following in response to a post a while back. I think it lends itself well to this discussion:
Essentially, it is as simple as setting expectations. A coach needs to speak with his/her team and explain clearly what is expected of them. This includes not only expectations on the field or court, but away from them as well. Personal behavior and scholastic expectations along with expectations during practice and games (I also include off-season in this when I meet with my kids prior to the first practice).
This should be done not only verbally, but in writing as well. A contract needs to take place between the student and the coach. I also include my own commitment to my players (to do my best to teach and help my students improve both athletically and academically) and I sign each contract in front of each individual player (and their parents when possible). I also set up a meeting to which I ask every parent to attend together (when I started in coaching, I was lucky to get 25% attendance, now I get over 90%). At this meeting, always before the first game of the season, I explain our team goals for the season and the methods I intend to use to help their children achieve these goals. I discuss the concept of team play, and expectations of playing time. I explain that, depending upon game situations; that not all kids are guaranteed to see playing time.
Although I do not discuss it, I do have a personal policy surrounding special teams play, where I attempt to let every kid on my teams get on the field. I've never regretted doing so. At this meeting, I also ask my parents to be on their best behavior as well. I don't expect booing of officials, opponents or poor play. Essentially, I ask them to be role models for not only their own children, but for all the kids in the stands as well. What I have found over the years is that if you explain to parents what your goals are and your methods to accomplish your goals, they are far less likely to complain about playing time, play calling and anything else for that matter. When you add expectations surrounding their own behavior, and the reasons for these expectations, they seem to take the responsibility seriously. As much as anything, it's a matter of respect. Respect for the kids and respect for their parents. My experience is when I show it them, I get it back in spades.
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4
It didn't take long to prove my point. Two perfect examples. One of the 5-10% kind and one of the 90% kind.
HDohm is a players (and parents) dream. His primary concern is ALL the kids not just a few. HDohm thanks for making a difference in kids lives!
epcthree, now he's a different story. Immediately goes into the "lessons" a kid learns by sitting on the bench. Tells me I should volunteer. Since I didn't volunteer I MUST be wrong. Let me clarify my rule comment JUST FOR YOU. Yes there is a national little league rule but some leagues go over and above the national rule requiring more playing time. Sorry if you were confused. "I discuss the concept of team play, and expectations of playing time. I explain that, depending upon game situations; that not all kids are guaranteed to see playing time." Ahh got it. You explain to them in the beginning that they are going to get screwed so it's ok. Get real. What is my experience? How about two leagues, twelve years, two kids, four divisions, probably eight different teams. By and large my comments are right on. Sorry if you are offended. Too bad. It feels similar to sit on the bench most of the time.....
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 68
UNICEF recognizes the critical role of sport and physical play in children’s lives.
At the most fundamental level, sport and play are a child’s right, as detailed in article 31 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child: States shall “recognize the right of the child to rest and leisure, to engage in play and recreational activities appropriate to the age of the child and to participate freely in cultural life and the arts."
Added to this is the broad consensus that regular physical activity is essential for the physical, mental, psychological and social development of children and adolescents. Involvement in sport can boost children’s health, improve academic performance and help reduce crime.
UNICEF believes that sport can be an effective programmatic tool to help achieve goals in health, education, gender equality, HIV/AIDS, child protection and child development. That is the concept of sport for development – that sport is not just an end in itself, but also an effective tool to help improve the lives of children, families and communities.
Sport, recreation and play are a fun way to learn values and lessons that will last a life time. They promote friendship and fair play. They teach team work, discipline, respect, and the coping skills necessary to ensure that children develop into caring individuals. They help prepare young people to meet the challenges they will face and to take leadership roles within their communities.
UNICEF uses sport festivals and games to educate families about health issues, including the need for vaccination and HIV/AIDS prevention. UNICEF supports programmes that use the power of sport to reach children and adolescents who are often excluded and discriminated against, including orphans, children with disabilities, former child soldiers, refugee and displaced children, sexually exploited children and children from indigenous communities.
With our partners, UNICEF is incorporating opportunities for sport, recreation and play into country programmes to reach children, families and communities around the world. In countries at peace and at war, these activities are being used to promote good health, encourage girls' education, create child-friendly spaces and warn about the harmful effects of smoking, alcohol and drug abuse. They are educating young people on the dangers of HIV/AIDS and empowering them with the life skills necessary to protect themselves.
Sport and recreation programs are creating environments that are safe and promote stable relationships between children and adults, and among children themselves. They are providing children of all ages with opportunities to express themselves, to contribute their voice, opinions and ideas, and to become agents for change. They are helping to build communities and are contributing to a more just and peaceful society.
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 137
Had you BOTHERED to read and understand what I wrote you would have taken note that I stated that I DID play all my kids when I coached little league. Started the reserves in fact, in order to ensure that they played - as opposed to waiting until the end of a game. You talk about your vast experience; I only ask one question - was ANY of it as a coach?
Now, as a varsity high school football coach (perhaps something else you missed), my kids are at a different level of competition than little leaguers. Yet, as I mentioned, I STILL attempt to play all my kids. You somehow read that I stated I was giving kids "lessons". Those are YOUR words, not mine. Perhaps you would suggest that all varsity teams at the high school level only compete if every kid gets exactly equal playing time. Better yet, let's stop keeping score. That will certainly teach kids that life is always fair.
I'm all about letting kids get playing time when they are under a certain age. By the time a young athlete is competing in high school, he or she is - or at least should be - understanding that winning is a goal, along with having fun, developing positive relationships and all the other benefits of sport.
As to your placing me in your 90% group, I'll put all the letters, phone calls and positive comments that I've received from both my players AND my parents over my career up against anyone.
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1
I have to agree with epcthree, yes, the mercy rule was called, otherwise your grandson would have batted.
In league play there is a 'lineup' and you must bat according to its order. If you add a player to the game, he goes in the spot of the person he is replacing, thus some may bat a second time before the newcomer gets to bat.
That's baseball.
Now while Little Leagues have adjusted a lot of the rules to give more kids a chance, it will never be completely fair to everyone, from everyones point of view, but they do the best they can.
So in this case it was the rules of the league with the 'mercy rule' that caused your grandson not to bat, not the coach.
Now about coaches, from what I know, but I could be wrong, they are volunteers, if they do get paid, it would be minimal. They have chosen to take an active role that not only benefits their kids, but yours and all of the others on the team.
I am not a coach but a "Big Brother" from the mentoring "Big Brothers & Big Sisters", my "little" plays in the league and I go to 90% of his games. What is sad, is the fact that at most of the games I have been to the past couple of years is the fact that only handful of parents watch the games and it is usually the same ones each week.
I watch the grief that the coaches get from the kids to the parents, and it is unjustified. Yes, some coaches are better then others in skill, or how they play the game, etc, but a coach does not do it to make a 'private team' for his son. Whatever it was that got him (them) into coaching goes well beyond that, and as you see, there are no private teams.
Do some coaches kids get more playing time then other kids? Perhaps, is that fair? Maybe not.
If you want to really help your grandson, which I believe you do, be a positive factor at the games, step up and talk to the coach and see how you can help, maybe it is as simple as helping some other kids get to the games, to keeping score. Take your grandson to the batting cages to help him with his batting, encourage him to practice with other teammates or friends.
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 61
I must say, my son has ventured into Pittsburg Little League for the first time. He plays with the majors. In his very first game, he came off of the bench. He was not a bench warmer by any means. I might have kept him on the bench for a little while just to see how the game was going. He has had no experience with Baseball at all. His Coach is a great Coach and saw it differentlt, he put him at Center Field and kept him out there which allowed him to assist with an out. He was also able to bat. The entire team was allowed to bat. This is my first time in Little League and already with the practices as well as the games. I am so sorry for those who have had bad experiences with Coaches, but there are more good Coaches out there than Bad Coaches.
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 137
Essentially, you have made my point.
The reality is that the 90/10 percentage stated earlier may very well be correct, but it's backwards. My own personal experience is that at least 80-90% of youth coaches ARE good people who care more about their kids, then they do about winning. Certainly there are a number of coaches out there that don't have it right, and the number is higher than it should be. That said, for some, that is all they seem to focus on and they can't seem to acknowledge that MOST coaches are good and positive role models for their kids.
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4
epcthree
By and large my comments are right on. Sorry if you are offended. Too bad. It feels similar to sit on the bench most of the time.....
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 137
I'm not offended at all... I've been exposed to your type before. Bottom line, you are entitled to your opinion; I happen to think that by and large, you are dead wrong. It seems that I and the other posters feel pretty much the same way so I suppose that's the way it will be.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 26
Put me in Coach, I'm ready to play today.
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3
Great topic.I am in the middle of my first season as a manager for my 6yr old daughters team.I was absolutely disgusted with her first 2 coaches.They argued calls,yelled at the parents,stressed winning,and created a negative climate around the team.One even let the 4,5 and 6 year olds know how disappointed he was in them after losing a game.Tell me what you think of this move: bases loaded and the coach calls time to switch the infield around to make sure of the out.The better fielding first baseman is moved to 3rd base because most balls are hit there. The message to the 5 year old girl that was playing 3rd? "Sorry honey you are not good enough to catch the ball and touch the base.Plus coach is more interested in winning than giving you an opportunity to try,possibly creating a "coachable moment".Message to the parents:I am here to win,not teach your kids. This experience has motivated me to coach.I told my parents at the start that I have no interest in wins or losses.I want the girls to learn the game,progress,make friends,get some excercise,and build some self confidence. So how is it now?Well we have become quite the little powerhouse of a team.The girls are having a great time.They cheer eachother on.They run into the batter's box ready to hit.They make great plays in the field.They yell out the # of outs.They hustle after the ball.All of this has come from positive reinforcement.They know that coach will never get down on them.They feel safe. We are on a 4 game win streak and I only mention that because 3 of the games were against teams with AWFUL coaches.Each one has made kids cry on the field as a direct result of things the coach said.One coach had to be asked by the parents to leave the dugout in the middle of a tirade after our little team gave them their first loss.One has been kicked out of a game for cursing at the ump.( remember,4,5 and 6 year olds here)And the other has caused some of my own parents to complain this year.Meanwhile our attitude never changes in our dugout,win or lose. After one game the girls were on the bench and they were absolutely glowing with pride. I said"you guys feel pretty good right now huh?" and the answer was a loud yes.I didn't have to say much because they knew exactly what was going on.They want to do well for themselves already.Self esteem.Teamwork.Unity.Sportsmanship.Progress.It's all happening on this team. Bottom line is that coaches are there to teach and I think that many of them forget this or never knew it. .PEACE
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4
Mid Season Report
My kids team has three coaches. The three coaches kids hit 1-2-3 every game. All three kids pitch. All three kids have played every inning of every game. They have not sat for one out the entire season. I would say their little private team is suiting them just fine. Now if the coaches could only figure out how to pay them a salary too. Funny thing is all three kids walk around like they are the best players on the team. Nothing could be further from the truth.......
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14
Bill2424
What you are experiencing is one reason I decided to coach. I too was tired of coaches kids' getting preferential treatment. It's ludicrous that it has to be this way. I am sure many of the other parents feel like you do. Hang in there and good luck.