Pure Lavender Mafiosa Whenever Deconstructing the intrinsically aberrant, degrading and objectively disordered nature of the sick hatreds and vile perversions that make up the mainstream of the Radical Leftist / Gender Feminist / Homosex agenda, it is always important to remember the 'Politics of Adversarial Terminology' at play in their hatemongering pogrom of societal destruction. Hence the use of sanitized and gaily misleading euphemisms that encourage the Orwellian 'Doublethink' necessary to making such sickness and hatred palatable to the 'Vanilla' (clueless voters / readers) - is an important tool for such Hatemongers to insure that the 'Vanilla' remain ignorant enough of the facts behind the scam that they will still cast their ballots in obedience to the dictates of said Old Media Homosex Propagandists. Thus - while the pretense of a united front of solidarity is regularly spun to the Vanilla as the 'truth' - the fact is that there are huge differences between the various factions that make up the dirty rainbow of perversions and hatreds that is their banner. The two main forces in the 'Pander or Perish' movement have little in common, save for their rabid frothing hind foot thumping Misandry (Hatred of Men, Masculinity and Normal Heterosexuality), and although the watchdogs of the old media try and play it down - such differences are quite apparent from their own behaviors and postures. Hence, while most attention is still focused on the Pathological Disease Spreading Antics of the Coprophile Cult of Feces Focused Homo-Anal Perversions (the Barney Frank / Drag Queen Wing), this is done in large measure to avoid deeper scrutiny of the Separatist / Neo-Exterminationist Cult of Dyke Misandry, and the ugly revelations that would result from such scrutiny. Even Radical Gender Feminist Icon Betty Goldstein (Freidan) warned in the early days of Feminism about the threat of takeover by what she called the "Lavender Menace," meaning Dyke Hatemongers and their agenda of Hatred Uber Alles. In Weimar Kalifornia the Lavender Menace, despite their tiny numbers in the population, has morphed in to a Lavender Mafia with virtual control over all 'gender' issues in the Legislature (a body not fit to pass gas), under the leadership of such notorious Hatemongers as Zelda Kuehl, $5 Smidgen, Jackie Goldbarge and Sleazy Suzzi Kennedy - all Powerful Prima-Donnaz of the Democrap Hate Machine. While pretending to represent 'Women', and using the fabricated hoax of their victimization culture as a front, they are actually the greatest enemies of Normal Women around - and rationalize their Hate Pogroms with propaganda claims supported by [bleep] Law Professors that All Heterosexual Intercourse is Rape - because Normal Women Can Not consent to such due to their oppression by the "Patriarchy." Hence - their Royal Choice of Lavender as the Color of Dyke Misandry is not a coincidence, but rather a reflection of their self appointed / anointed status as the Only Womyn whose views are allowed to be considered legitimate, because their Rabid Misandry makes them more enlightened than ordinary Women - who they Alone Must Represent, even if it is against their Will. As the following excerpt from the Frisco Crock about the Enda scam in Congress shows, eventually such Hatemongers and their Misandrist allies show their true colors. BTW - Religious Organizations are Not Exempt from the bill - but like the Boy Scouts and others are Specifically Targeted for Destruction - and the claim is simply another Old Media Lie... So what else is new... OhsoIn a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carolyn Lochhead, Chronicle Washington Bureau November 8, 2007. The Employment Non-Discrimination Act... emotional debate about whether to include gender identity in the bill split gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgender people for weeks. Most gay rights organizations, with the exception of the Human Rights Campaign, opposed the legislation, and a handful of liberal Democrats voted against the bill with evident distress. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, wearing a lavender suit as a symbolic gesture of solidarity... said she was disappointed that it excluded transgender people... dropping transgender people from the anti-discrimination bill, known as ENDA, enraged gay leaders and tore apart the gay community. For the first time, most gay rights groups were on the opposite side of Frank, their longtime champion, each angrily and publicly denouncing the other... to round up votes for an amendment by Rep. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., the only openly lesbian House member, to include transgender people in the bill. Baldwin, too, wore lavender and vowed that transgender ... I will do everything in my power to make this measure whole again." Frank, however, denounced what he called self-defeating ideological purists... Religious organizations are exempted from the bill. But Republicans warned that the legislation would force Christian, Muslim and other religious businesses such as bookstores that are not affiliated with an official religious group to hire homosexuals. To beat back GOP attacks, Democrats also included a reaffirmation that the Defense of Marriage Act banning federal recognition of same-sex marriage remains intact. Edited 11/11/2007 12:44 pm ET by Ohso1

DOMA, Sweet DOMA (FRC) For months, the House and Senate have been out of touch with Americans, and the introduction of a new domestic partner policy proves it. On December 19, shortly before the chambers recessed, members of both the House and Senate sponsored bills that would essentially invalidate the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).  Under the new legislation government employees and their same-sex partners would be eligible to receive federal health and insurance benefits. The Domestic Partnership Benefits and Obligations Act, introduced in the Senate as S. 2521 by Sens. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.) and Gordon Smith (R-Ore.) and in the House as H.R. 4838 by Reps. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), Chris Shays (R-Conn.), Harry Waxman (D-Calif.), and Tom Davis (R-Va.), would force taxpayers to subsidize a sexual lifestyle that a majority of them find morally objectionable. If congressional leaders believe that a new era of acceptance has dawned, they need only to look to their own home states, where efforts to enshrine traditional marriage into law are energizing voters as never before. In November, four states are gearing up to join the 27 that have already amended their constitutions to protect marriage as God intended it--as the union of one man and one woman. Two others expect a vote as early as next year. The only ones in denial of America's legislative priorities happen to be the leaders setting them. Help us deliver the reality check that Congress so desperately needs. Click the link below and ask your representatives to vote "no" on H.R. 4838 and S. 2521. Take Action Now Congressional Directory

Many Unhappy ReturnsFRC: The holidays have given everyone in Washington an opportunity to rest, and given the latest priorities of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), the pro-family forces will need it. As the House reconvenes today, the leadership is expected to start the New Year in much the same way as it ended the old--with renewed attacks on marriage, ethical science, and employers' rights. Despite the widespread success of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, which reinforce the lack of need for embryonic stem cell (ESC) research, Democrats plan to stage yet another vote on the bill that would force taxpayers to fund ESC. As I mentioned last week, there is already a campaign underway to overturn the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) by granting the homosexual partners of federal employees the same rights and privileges as married spouses. And last, but certainly not least, don't count out "hate crimes" or the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), both of which are at the top of the liberal "to do" list. Stay tuned to the Update, because we are certain to need all values voters on deck in the coming weeks!

Pelosi: House Rules Are Made to Be Broken (FRC) The military follows congressional orders. Unfortunately for Defense Secretary Robert Gates, the House leadership does not. Earlier this year, the Pentagon refused a request by Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.) to bring her lesbian partner on a military flight to Europe. Under House rules, only a legal spouse (or, in some instances, an adult child) is eligible to travel with members of Congress when space permits. Baldwin, who claims to have "married" Lauren Azar in 1998, insists on registering her girlfriend as a "spouse" on government forms even though her own home state doesn't recognize same-sex marriage. Secretary Gates insisted that he was following Congress's own protocol in blocking Azar from the transport, but that didn't prevent Pelosi from contacting his office and demanding that he make an exception. According to Pelosi, former Speaker Dennis Hastert authorized similar trips. His former aides, however, disagree, saying that in at least one instance Hastert wasn't informed that Azar was on a trip "until it had already begun." Gates too was unaware of any prior exceptions but said that he would honor Pelosi's request if she issued an official letter approving it. Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell points to the irony of the Speaker wanting to waive her own rules to create gay-friendly exceptions. "This is not an issue of DOD regulations," Morrell says. "Secretary Gates honored a request from Speaker Pelosi& but that's really as far as it goes. This should not be viewed as a precedent." Tell that to the Speaker of the House. Although the matter was temporarily resolved, the dispute is ongoing. There is more behind this than a seat on a military plane, this is about hijacking the meaning of marriage. It is clear that the Speaker's actions are in direct conflict with the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)--a law that Congress passed and former President Bill Clinton signed.

The "Pelosi 100" vs. the 'Vanilla' CHINO Nancy, aka 'kindly ole Granny Pelosi' - one of the richer womyn in democrap politics, is no stranger to the rarified air of VIP / BIg Money special treatment; particularly as the daughter of an established east coast political power clan and operator of its Sodom by the Sea Franchise. Thus the ABC World News Footage broadcast (8/27) of one of their reporters being arrested while following the "Money Trail' at the democrap convention - including the Big Money Members of that otherwise seldom mentoined club known as "The Pelosi 100", must not have set very well with kindly old Granny 'P'. But hey - the party of the 'Vanilla' (Clueless voters / taxpayers) portrays both Pelosi and Biden as 'catholic' - although both are vicious enemies of the Church and almost all it Teaches, so claiming to represent the interests of working folks against the 'fat cat repubs' is no bigger lie, and just as effective at getting said Vanills to vote for their pimp cult. Provided of course that the Old Media Play Along - and turn a blind eye where required. Which apparently ABC did not, at least this once - but then it was World News, and not the Frisco Affiliate, which manges to avoid notice of the Annual SF DYKE MARCH / Anti Male Hate Riot - also staged each year in CHINO Carpet Bagger Pelosis adopted left coast Capitol. Ohso In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutoinary act. George Orwell >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Money Trail: Putting on the Ritz, VIP Treatment for Big Money Democrats Cocktails and Canapés in the Sky Box While Delegates Line Up for $7 Hot Dogs (ABC News) ABC Reporter Arrested in Denver Taking Pictures of Senators, Big Donors ...By BRIAN ROSS, RHONDA SCHWARTZ, AVNI PATEL & ASA ESLOCKER. DENVER Aug. 27, 2008. While its elected officials say it is the party of "the working people," Democrats are quietly running an elaborate VIP program that rewards wealthy contributors with luxury perks and insider access at the Denver convention, part of what the party calls a "business plan." Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) created the "Pelosi 100" for people .................................................................................................... ABC Reporter Arrested in Denver Taking Pictures of  Senators,...                                       Aug 27, 2008 ... Why would they would risk having a ABC producer arrested? ... "Pelosi 100," attend a private, lavish party Monday ... www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2... ............................................................................................ ABC Cameraman Arrested: What are the Dems hiding? - Sean Hannity... Aug 27, 2008 ... Police in Denver arrested an ABC News producer today as he and a camera crew ... Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., known as the "Pelosi 100," attend a ... forums.hannity.com/showthread.php

Pope Pelosi at the gate Kathleen Parker, Washington Post Writers Group August 28, 2008 He was resurrected as Pelosi was trying to respond to the question that refuses to die: When does human life begin? This time, it was Tom Brokaw asking on Sunday's "Meet the Press." Citing Barack Obama's recent pass on a similar question - "At what point does a baby get human rights?" - Brokaw asked Pelosi what she would say to Obama were he to ask her advice. Pelosi didn't finesse her answer, as Obama did when he said the question was above his pay grade, but she may wish she had. "I would say that as an ardent, practicing Catholic, this is an issue that I have studied for a long time," Pelosi began. "And what I know is, over the centuries, the doctrines of the church have not been able to make that definition. ... St. Augustine said at three months. We don't know. The point is, is that it shouldn't have an impact on a woman's right to choose. ... I don't think anybody can tell you when life begins, human life begins." Few paragraphs have contained more falsehoods. The reaction was swift from Denver's archbishop, the Rev. Charles J. Chaput, among others, who condemned Pelosi's comments during Mass that same evening. Blogging on Monday, Chaput quoted Jesuit John Connery, author of "Abortion: The Development of the Roman Catholic Perspective," who concluded that "the Christian tradition from the earliest days reveals a firm anti-abortion attitude." It is true that laws and penalties concerning abortion have evolved. "Right to life" is a relatively new concept. It is also true that Augustine - and St. Thomas Aquinas eight centuries later - subscribed to a "delayed hominization" theory, meaning that abortion couldn't be homicide because the fetus doesn't receive a soul until a certain point in its development. Augustine even thought that "hominization" occurred earlier for males than for females. Is it possible that the same authority whom Pelosi invokes to justify her belief in choice also ranked the female fetus below the male on God's "Ensoulments To Do" list? We may forgive Augustine, of course, because people didn't know much about nascent life in the early 400s. The ovum wasn't discovered until 1827. Fetal imaging, now routine for expectant parents, was unimaginable. If Augustine had known then what we know now, would he stand by Pelosi as she asserts that when life begins should have no bearing on a woman's right to choose? The U.S. Supreme Court ruled as much in Roe vs. Wade, obviously, but Justice Harry A. Blackmun dodged the question of when life begins using the same rationale as Pelosi - that because scientists, theologians and others couldn't agree on when life begins, then a woman's privacy trumped the unborn's right to due process. One may choose to believe that out of convenience or conscience, but the logic of the court was both self-contradictory and incorrect, according to Robert P. George, a professor of jurisprudence at Princeton and a member of the President's Council on Bioethics. By its ruling, says George, the court implicitly determined when life begins (against the fetus), while ignoring science that long before had determined the facts of human embryogenesis. In his new book, "Embryo," George and co-author Christopher Tollefsen, associate professor of philosophy at the University of South Carolina, left religion behind and set out to establish the embryo's personhood by reviewing all the major scientific works on human embryogenesis and early intrauterine development. Included was American medicine's most prominent human embryology text, "The Developing Human," whose authors are not imprecise on the matter of life: "Human development begins at fertilization when a male gamete or sperm (spermatozoon) unites with a female gamete or oocyte (ovum) to produce a single cell - a zygote. This highly specialized, totipotent cell marked the beginning of each of us as a unique individual." In other words, human life begins at conception. That is not a religious posture, but a scientific fact that the lowest paid laborer on the planet can assert without qualm. What we do with that understanding is another matter, but no one in the 21st century should pretend not to know when human life begins. On this matter at least, the church and science are in agreement.   To comment, e-mail Kathleen Parker at kparker@kparker.com.