Nazi Homosex Hatemongers are not currently part of the Radical Homosex Thought Police plan for Co-Opting historical figures, at least not just yet - during the 'coy' phase of the takeover.

Later on, Gay Icons like the Boy Raping Ephebophile Nazi Founder Ernst Rohm and his Syphilitic Prostitute Protege Hitler can be 'reintroduced', after being gaily sanitized (like Ginsberg and Milk) by their coprophile fan clubs of course.

Of Brave New World of Dyketopia - With Such Wonders as These Turkey Basters to Behold... Ohso In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutoinary act. George Orwell >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Revisionist Homosexual History

Florence Nightingale, Abraham Lincoln, George Washington Carver, and Joan of Arc. What do all of these historic figures have in common? According to the homosexual agenda, they were all gay. For many years conservative and Christian leaders have been sounding the alarm about revisionists' campaign to rewrite history. These revisionists have distorted history to advance political and societal agendas for atheism, feminism, and finally homosexuality.

These revisionists understand that education, especially concerning history, is their most powerful tool in molding young minds to accept their agenda. When a child is told, from the tender age of 5 through their entire public school career, that homosexuality, bisexuality, transsexuality and other controversial lifestyles are normal and to be honored, they will accept this as truth.

That is why this battle over school curriculum is so crucial. We are fighting for the hearts and minds of a generation. The SB 777 referendum is the current battlefront in defending innocent children from indoctrination.

The homosexual rights group that sponsored this law, Equality California, finally admitted last week that SB 777 is in fact about curriculum-not just preventing discrimination against students. In their 2007 legislative scorecard the group declared that the bill "prohibits curriculum that is discriminatorily biased against LGBT people and other protected groups," including transsexuals, transgenders, and bisexuals. These activists are keenly aware that they need "inclusive" curriculum in order to start indoctrinating young minds.

According to the Safe Schools Coalition, a group formed to advance homosexual teachings in school, "inclusive" curriculum should feature historic figures that were considered gay, including the figures listed above. There is no evidence to suggest that these figures were in fact homosexuals, but when revising history, it's preferable to co-opt real historic figures for your cause.

With the passage of SB 777, we can now expect year-round homosexual instruction. The Safe Schools Coalition features 12-month lesson plans for teachers to use. For January, students can expect to learn about George Washington Carver's "letters documenting his same-sex relationships, although of course, given the era in which he lived, he was not particularly open about his sexual orientation." February is African-American History Month and features more instruction on Mr. Carver and other African-American gay figures.

March is Women's History Month and students will learn about "women-loving-women born this month" including Susan B. Anthony who is "believed by historians to have had three intimate relationships with women in her life." Teachers will also instruct students on the definitions of such terms as "lesbian," "transgender," "intersex," "questioning," and "two-spirit." Teachers are encouraged to "infuse LGBTIQ/2-spirit cultural awareness into the every day life" of their classroom. These types of detailed lesson plans exist for every month of the year, with special attention paid to June (GLBT Pride Month) and October (GLBT History Month).

As you can see, we face a well-organized and well-financed (with tax-payer dollars) agenda. The SB 777 referendum is about the people. Every day we receive letters, e-mails and phone calls of support from the thousands of people who understand just how critical this campaign is.

To help us protect the innocence of children we ask that you (1) send in your petitions as soon as possible... Together, we can preserve our values and save our kids.

Dear Friends,

I sometimes despair at the horror stories coming through the wires : of traditional marriage, as well as parenthood, being hijacked by homosexuals; of the harassing and bullying of parents protesting their loss of rights re their children's educational development; of the growing influence of homosexuals in educational institutions, the media and entertainment industry; homosexuality rife in the priesthood, the police, among our politicians; the mutilation of our English language, supposedly to appease the sensitivities of homosexuals, etc.

It occurred to me that we are not getting very far in opposing this moral and political onslaught by traditional means of debate; that we could be far more effective - and therefore successful - by also pointing out some simple facts about the very real agenda, and the contrived propaganda methods, which are driving this whole Devilish phenomenon.

While I'm aware that some of you are very well informed on all of this, many of you may not be, so with this in mind I am attaching what I regard as two most valuable items which divulge the real homosexual agenda, as well as the awesome chicanery recommended for its implementation. They are :-

"The 1972 Gay Rights Platform" - Created at the National Coalition of Gay Organisations Convention held in Chicago in 1972 (3 pages) At the Federal level there are nine demands; at the State level there are eight demands. Under State, number seven is most telling : "Repeal of all laws governing the age of consent", yet they say they are not interested in sex with children! Immediately prior to that one, "Repeal of all state laws prohibiting transvestism and cross-dressing". which is becoming the latest battleground in some U.S. schools.....

"The Overhauling of Straight America", an article of 11 pages, written by Marshall K. Kirk and Erastes Pill (pen-name of Hunter Madsen, according to Wikipedia) which appeared in the now-defunct homosexual Guide Magazine of November 1987. Later expanded by Kirk and Madsen into the book After the Ball : How America will conquer its fear and hatred of Gays in the 90's. (Pub. Plume 1990)

I found a brief Overview of the above article on the net by www.catholicparents.org headed "The Truth about the Homosexual Campaign" which rather puts it in a nutshell. Some excerpts from it :-

"(The authors) stated 'In the early stages of any campaign to reach straight America, the massses should not be shocked and repelled by premature exposure to homosexual behaviour itself. Instead the imagery of sex should be downplayed and gay rights should be reduced to an abstract social question as much as possible. First let the camel get his nose inside the tent - only later his unsightly derriere!

The plan was - and still is - to present the controversy surrounding homosexuality as a civil rights issue that is to be promoted in the name of sexual freedom by legislated law, and taught to our young adults and children in school as a diversity issue.

Yes, homosexuality cast in the mumb-jumbo of sexual orientation, and the pleading for tolerance, where none is deserved, is being taught to our children. Thereby, the homosexual's (sic) plan is to have societal and legal acceptance of a proven compulsive and lethal addiction, the most bizarre and obscene sexual practices, as commonplace in the social fabric of the nation.

Kirk and Pill note 'In any campaign to win over the public, gays must be cast as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to assume the role of protector.'

Kirk and Pill also recommend smearing their enemies, comparing them to the KKK and Nazis (and now Christians as Talibans). They write : 'To be blunt, they must be vilified. We intend to make the anti-gays look so nasty that average Americans will want to dissociate themselves from such types.'

This homosexual plan is designed to hide the facts about homosexual behaviour and to portray homosexuals as victims. This plan to villify their enemies has been wildly successful." (end of quote)

In conclusion, then, it seems to me that we have powerful ammunition here with which to fight this venomous social scourge in our midst. I am convinced that masses of currently well-meaning supporters of "gay rights" - to say nothing of public institutions and big-spending corporate supporters - would be shocked to discover that they were, in reality, no more than dupes - pawns in a vicious game - and would quickly re-think their situation.

I think it is high time we let the damning FACTS speak for themselves. As I always say, they are notoriously hard to argue against!

Barbara

'Sex indoctrination opponents are like Hitler' - Board member blasts critics of state's 'gay' promotions. http://www.worldnetdaily.com

A school board member in California says those who oppose the state's SB777, a law approved by last year's legislature and signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger that restricts public schools to teaching only positive perspectives of homosexuality, are "like Hitler."

The report comes from Karen England of Capitol Resource Family Impact, which is working on the Save Our Kids campaign to assemble enough petition signatures in the state to put SB777 on the 2008 election ballot.

"Last night the West Covina Unified School Board took a bold stand for families and our values by voting to pass a resolution supporting the Save Our Kids initiative," said England's report. "This is the first local school board to publicly protest SB777 and its harmful policies."

"Three brave members of the school board voted to support Save our Kids: Steve Cox, Mike Spence and Camie Poulos. However, two members refused to support the Save Our Kids resolution: George Fuller and Jessica Shewmaker," she said.

"Just before the vote on the resolution occurred, board member Fuller actually declared that anyone who opposes SB777 and its sexual indoctrination is like Adolf Hitler. He asserted that there once was 'a man who tried to rid the world of homosexuals; Hitler didn't survive,'" she reported.

"Board member Spence demanded an immediate apology from Fuller for comparing citizens with traditional values to an evil dictator like Adolf Hitler. Fuller refused to apologize," England said.

"We are extremely excited that the West Covina Unified School Board is supporting the protection of innocent children from sexual indoctrination," England said. "But our victory here also revealed just how bigoted and hateful some school board members are. Board member George Fuller should publicly apologize to the citizens of his district and all Californians for comparing us to Adolf Hitler. This is shameful behavior from an elected school board member and his constituents should be very concerned this man is making decisions about their children's education.

"We encourage every recipient of this email to contact West Covina Unified School Board members George Fuller and Jessica Shewmaker and ask why they did not support the Save Our Kids resolution," she said. "Also, contact George Fuller and ask him why he won't apologize for comparing citizens with traditional values to Adolf Hitler."

"SB777 is a mandate for every school district, ending local control on sensitive issues," the Save Our Kids website says. "SB777 normalizes homosexuality, bisexuality, and transsexuality across the state, without room for local discretion on addressing these issues."

England told WND that the law is not a list of banned words, including "mom" and "dad." But she said the requirement is that the law bans discriminatory bias and the effect will be to ban such terminology.

"Having 'mom' and 'dad' promotes a discriminatory bias. You have to either get rid of 'mom' and 'dad' or include everything when talking about [parental issues]," she said. "They [promoters of sexual alternative lifestyles] do consider that discriminatory."

The California plan still is facing a court challenge on its constitutionality in addition to the possible vote of the people.

The organization notes earlier state law already "establishes equal protection for every California public school student," so that SB777 was unnecessary. It specifically requires: "No teacher shall give instruction nor shall a school district sponsor any activity that promotes a discriminatory bias" against homosexuality, bisexuality and transsexuality." l

Homeschooling Gestapo Strikes Again

What do homeschooling and drunk driving have in common? A lot, according to a German judge who made the comparison when he sentenced parents to three months in jail for educating their children at home.

Juergen and Rosemarie Dudek, both Christians, are one of the estimated 400 couples in Germany who secretly homeschool their kids despite an antiquated ban on the practice instituted by Adolf Hitler 70 years ago.

The decision, which smacks of Nazi-era oppression, will be appealed to a higher court, where the ruling will likely stand. German courts have repeatedly upheld homeschooling as a form of "child abuse," a conclusion echoing that of a California court last February when a three-judge panel struck down the rights of homeschooling parents in that state.

While the California ruling was later vacated, both have something in common--the desire to use public education as a vehicle for indoctrinating children in the liberal views of the state.

Additional Resources
LifeSiteNews: German Homeschooling Parents Sentenced to Three Months in Prison