The Problem with Liberals-->-->-->
--> -->
Liberals , by definition want change. Historically Liberals have expressed that desire in a manner that was respectful of other views, and promoted a civil society. These Liberals, while they have concepts that can not be respected by the majority in this nation because it supplants individual liberty with group normalcy, could be respected for their approach and demeanor. -->-->
In contrast, today’s liberals are promoting the same elimination of basic liberties, but without the respect for other opinions. Since the great experiments in Socialism failed, today’s crop of liberals, (note the respect of a capital is not granted because it is not earned) are both strident, and extremely disrespectful of alternative ideas. If you need examples look at Hillery Clinton, or John Kerry, or the current leader of the Democratic party. All three express violent hate of anyone who dares to disagree with them: they want change and they do not care who gets hurt in the process, and they want not just power, but uncontested power. In this way, Hillery and Kerry do resemble Hitler in the 30’s. Their violent hatred is a mental illness.-->-->
The pathology of this illness goes deeper than to be fixated on perpetuation. It goes to the very foundations of human identity, so deep that most in the left are not even aware of what spirit motivates them. I said spirit and not thought because the matter of identity starts with what spirit they decided early in their lives to associate with, the spirit of truth or the spirit of un-truth. -->-->
In short, the problems of the left are the decisions they make about how to process information and how to relate to the world around them. Liberals redefine right and wrong at a very early stage in order to create there own realities. In their personal realities they can justify any behavior and are completely detached from the harm they do to others. -->-->
The very first thing that liberals lose when they are infected by this mental illness are externally-defined, timeless moral principles that govern society. Note the levels of disgust you constantly here from liberals for traditional society, and even main stream values. In the liberal mindset, laws should be used only to enforce compliance from the mindless sheep they govern, not insure individual life, liberty, or happiness. This is the common arrogance most modern liberals are noted for; and this is the truth they campaign so desperately to hide.-->-->
The next thing liberals lose in there artificial realities that they make for themselves is the ability to judge the motivations and the realities of others. As seen today, Liberals just can not believe that a group of Islamic fascists is intent on destroying the western world. Hitler could not understand why -->-->-->America-->--> in the thirties would defend the independence of -->-->Russia-->--> and -->-->England-->-->, not could he comprehend the horror and revulsion the world felt over the torture and death of 6 million Jews. -->-->
When principles and facts are not worth respecting, the only thing that is respected is power. Liberalism today is not so much about their own perpetuation as they are about power, because they cannot call upon principles, laws or facts when attempting to impose their will or to attain a goal, that is unless a selected principle, law or fact just happens to come in handy in the battle. -->-->This is why the left is so ardent about politics and serving in government. They crave power. In their personal realities, power is the only aphrodisiac, the only possession worth having. Today’s liberals are truly ill, and are only motivated be the power force others to comply with their philosophy.
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 76
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 76
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 358
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 76
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 358
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 76
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 76
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 76
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 76
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 76
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 76
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 76
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 76
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 76
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 76
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 76
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 76
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 76
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 76
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 76
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 76
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 76
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 76
- The use of direct, often confrontational action, such as a demonstration or strike, in opposition to or support of a cause.
ac·tiv·ism [ áktə vìzzəm ] noun Definition: vigorous action: vigorous and sometimes aggressive action in pursuing a political or social endJoined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1223
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 17
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 76