Posted on Fri, 10/28/2005 - 17:54 — by Ohso
Welcome, Lurkers! Yes indeed campers, A Great Big C.C. Times quality Welcome to all you Lurkers (aw, what the heck, peepers too) out there, come to gawk at this latest incarnation of the medias own self serving monkey on a pony show as it were, via the Net. Those who saw the Advertisement in todays paper (10/28/05) to visit ContraCostaTimes.com and join the discussion may not be familiar with the process (more later) around here, and may opt to simply lurk about, read and observe before joining in. Hence, my term: Lurkers
I personally think that Lurking is a prudent idea for newbys, because like a bird on a power line they have perched on a strong thread carrying empowerment to the masses, and like a bird on a power line it would be wise to ponder the charred lumps of feathers on the ground - right about where the lines come real close together. Probably something to do with touching a live wire, of which there are more than enough to go around to please even the most fastidious member of the Media Thought Police.
...And I have been around the internet for a very long time, relatively speaking. How long you may well ask? Why, certainly not before Al Gore invented the thing of course, but at least since the destruction of the very first Men's Issues message board at AOL / AWOL (American Womyn On Line) some eight and more years gone by now. It was there that I first encountered those shrill, shrieking, message board roosting thought police kommisars of the radical leftist / gender feminist / homosex lobby; a brood since become collectively known as the Resident Harpies (more later) of the Net.
Interestingly enough, although the CC Times is Advertising for subscribers to join SOME of their internet discussion boards, other highly active discussion boards run by the same enterprise (The C.C. Times Polls. Link = Click here: Contra Costa Times polls are almost completely ignored. Well, Not Even Mentioned, let alone Included in the other News Discussion List. This is despite (indeed, dare I say In-Spite-Of) the highly topical relevance of the content of the threaded posts found there - and you can fact check that one for yourself if you want.
Oh, and you Can make POLLS Discussion a Favorite. The problem is, that many of the types of Facts contained in the different threads in Polls are what our myopic seeing eye watchdogs of the press consider to be Ungood, and thus properly Censored in support of their propaganda campaigns on behalf of highly biased and deeply Misandrist (Male Hating) Political Agendas.
As columnist Robert Scheer pointed out in a recent piece (in another paper, the Frisco Crock-A-Bull 10/19/05) on the lack of examination of our For Profit Media: The owners of the Fourth Estate (press) have a unique ability to direct the searchlight of inquiry upon others, while remaining powerfully positioned to deflect it from themselves.
Indeed they do. CC Times (a Knight Ridder franchise) Editors and Staff fear not to use that power to promote their own Political Ideologies for Fun and Profit, and call it Reporting. Only one problem really; that pesky thing called the Net, and the fact that some subscribers actually do fact check the spin mechanics in the editorial room, and then post about it. Unless the Censors get there first (more later) or the Harpies swoop and dump spam by the bucket (more later), or they just hide some boards from Newbys.
Best Keep Quiet About It Though Wouldnt Want to Spread Any Ism-Obia
Ohso Not merely the validity of experience but the very existence of external reality was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was Common Sense. George Orwell 1984 >On the Thought Police.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 762
IVA:
Liberal activists are so hard up for actual hate crimes that they have to keep inventing them.
A student at George Washington University was caught by a hidden camera drawing six swastikas on her own dorm room door before she complained to campus authorities that she had been the target of hate.
She is apparently implicated in other hate crimes complaints on the GWU campus as well.
This is reminiscent of the BSU student who beat himself up on Boise's Greenbelt after the 2006 passage of Idaho's marriage amendment, and then tried to pass off his wounds as evidence of a hate crime.
Self-inflicted fake hate crimes are increasingly common. In fact, if you Google "fake hate crime" you will instanly get 3,100 hits.
The GWU student association scheduled a town hall forum for last night, for the purpose of discussing the prevention of hateful acts on campus. Sounds like the place to begin is with activist liberal students.
(GW Student Who Complained of Anti-Semetic Graffiti Admits Responsibility - washingtonpost.com)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 762
Male Feminist Analogs
I post this if only because it so closely mirrors my own experience (and that of many others) of the Radical Gender Feminist / Dyke Power Structure that infests our government, media & particularaly the pathetic farce that passes as the social engineering field of Academentia.
Indeed, it is now a 'mainstream' Feminist position to endorse reducing Males to a manageable 10% of the population (kind of like a free range sperm bank, only different), at least until they can be done away with completely in service of the Feminist agenda of 'tolerance'...
The analogy of Male Monkeys to the types of Self Loathing Male Feminists willing to trash all other Men in return for their own higher status and power, clearly works for the Democrap Power Structure - who all but line up to roll on thier backs and pee themselves in a politically approved manner in shame for being born with a Y Chromosome.
For example - the former Attorney General (now treasurer) for Weimar Kalifornia - the notorious Male Rape Baiting Gender Feminist - Wild Bull Lockyer, is on public record as supporting Male Homo-Anal Rape (and only Male Rape) in Prison as part of his Judicial / Equal Rights philosophy.
Rather than facing liability for such Misandrist Male Rape Baiting, Lockyer has in fact secured his place in the Democrap Power structure (subordinate to Alpha Dykes like Zelda Kuehl, $5 Smidgen, Sleazy Suzzi Kennedy... of course) through such Hatemongering - and the complicity of an Old Media Misandry Machine that just loves a good BAMN BAMN (Bash Men, By Any Means Necessary) story.
Of course, in fairness to all concerned, it must be pointed out that California Politicians are Not Monkeys - and No Insult to said Monkeys is in any way intended...
Ohso
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In rhesus realm, it's the female monkeys who rule - Biologist says a few males are tolerated in the ranks, but it's females who control families, territories
By William Mullen CHICAGO TRIBUNE 11/23/2007
For hundreds of thousands of years, female rhesus macaques have successfully ruled highly regimented societies in which the queenly alpha females control families, territories and resources, taking their followers into war as highly disciplined armies.
The males? A few rough, tough stud muffins are tolerated in the ranks to help out with security and protection and to be around for the mating season. But any male will soon be physically hurting and on the outside looking in -- or dead -- if he angers the females who run the show.
Rhesus monkeys may not be the smartest primates, but they are arguably the most successful primate species after humans, inhabiting more of the Earth than any other monkeys or apes. Their success, said Dario Maestripieri, may be because they are political animals, ruthless and opportunistic... a new book, "Macachiavellian Intelligence: How Rhesus Macaques and Humans Have Conquered the World," written for both academics and general readers.
People who like to think human society might be kinder and gentler if it were dominated by women won't find much support in female-dominated rhesus macaque society, which specializes in what Maestripieri calls "Machiavellian intelligence."
...The basic unit of rhesus society is called a group and is made up mostly of females and their young offspring, from a few dozen to hundreds of individuals. Female-headed subdivisions called matrilines are composed of a few dozen related females, such as grandmothers, mothers, sisters, cousins and babies. The most powerful female in the most powerful matriline is the supreme dictator of the entire group.
She shares her power with an alpha male, who dominates a relatively small cadre of males that the females allow to live among them.
The males, outnumbered perhaps 10 to 1, come from outside the group and are not related to each other or the females, so they have no power base of their own and can be expelled or killed by the female majority at any time.
"There's always an alpha male and a few subordinate males hanging around, there to provide protection from predators and to fight if the group goes to war," Maestripieri said.
Though the males are bigger and stronger, if one falls out of favor with the group -- including the alpha male -- the females gang up on him, using their teeth to tear away at his face, fingers, toes and genitals, anywhere that causes severe bleeding and likely death.
"If they turn on a male, he is going to lose, no matter how strong he is," said Maestripieri....
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 762
IVA;
Good for the Boy Scouts in Philadelphia. Dedicated to encouraging character and morality in the young men in its charge, the BSA has a policy against homosexuals serving as scoutmasters.
Given the well-established fact that homosexuals sexually offend against children at about 16 times the rate that heterosexuals do, this is simply good policy. In fact, it would be unconscionable for the Scouts to take any other position. The city of Philadelphia gave the Cradle of Liberty Council of the BSA until yesterday to change its policy or get thrown out of the building it built with its own money, gave to the city, and has leased back from the city since 1928 for $1 per year.
The Cradle of Liberty Council, to its everlasting credit, ignored the deadline. The city will now try to throw the Boy Scouts out on the street by June 1 of next year. The Supreme Court ruled in 2000 that the BSA is well within its rights to exclude homosexuals from its ranks. (In Pa., Scouts Refuse to Lift Ban)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 762
Boy Scouts: Be Prepared... to Be Evicted? (FRC)
In Philadelphia, the deadline has come and gone for the local Cradle of Liberty Council to either evacuate its headquarters or disown the organization's long-standing position on homosexuality. Mark Chilutti, a member of the Council's executive board, vowed to ignore yesterday's deadline.
Doing so puts the Boy Scouts in danger of losing the property that they've occupied for nearly 80 years. If the city solicitor carries through with his threat, the Council will be cast out of their building or forced to come up with $200,000 in rent for facilities they currently lease for $1 a year.
As one of the nation's most storied Boy Scout programs, serving over 64,000 young men a year, surely there are more important priorities for a city like Philadelphia with such high crime and delinquency rates than bullying a program that directly combats these problems.
The irony shouldn't be lost on anyone that lives or works miles from Independence Hall--the oppression of free speech and association goes on.Additional Resources
Scouts ignore gay-policy deadline [Philadelphia Inquirer]
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 762
The California Commission on the Status of Womyn - a Unique State Subsidized organ of Radical Gender Feminist MISANDRY (The Hatred of Men, Masculinity & Normal Heterosexuality), which uses tax money to support Radical Feminist / Homosex Political groups that in turn lobby the State for Money & Power to enforce their Mandatory Pandering Laws - recently forwarded through its system the attached piece of Old Media Hate Propaganda first published in the Sacramento Bee on 12/5/07 "Carlina Hansen: What women need in health care reform"
.
In a truly revealing expose of the types of "Feminist Logic" behind the Misandry that pervades our government, old media and the pathetic farce of academentia, the author doesn't just ignore the Shorter Lifespans of this nation's Despised and Disposable Male Minority, but actually incorporates them in to a pity ploy demanding that the State exclusively focus and fund programs for Womyn - Because the Live Longer!
Carlina Hansen: What women need in health care reform
By Carlina Hansen - Special To The Bee December 5, 2007
As Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and the Democratic leadership in the Legislature negotiate... it's important to consider a California constituency that hasn't received enough attention during this debate: women.
http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/543262.html <http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/543262.html
Edited 12/11/2007 1:20 pm ET by Ohso1
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 762
Enter now the mysterious "Q." The "Q" stands for "Questioning," and its new inclusion in the acronym of sexual immorality is quite telling, as it makes remarkably clear what we've been saying all along, that homosexual behavior is just that-behavior. Do an internet search on LBGTQ, and you'll see that the "Q" is now standard phraseology at our country's educational institutions, including: Brown, Arizona State, Colgate, George Mason, Toronto, Wisconsin, Chicago, Hawaii, Manhattan, North Carolina, and Georgetown, just to name a few. See also the Wikipedia definition, where other acronyms like LGBTQQ, LGBTQ2, LGBU, LGBTI, LGBTT, LGBTA, LGBTTTIQQA, FABGLITTER, etc., are fully described. Like Pinocchio's nose, the acronym grows longer with each added lie.
Thus, for the advocates of homosexual behavior, not only is their behavior some kind of normality or birth trait, like the color of your skin or your national origin, but it is now also a birth trait that is not recognizable at birth. In case you're not aware, this is the same argument that is made regarding those who are confused about their own sex. Individuals unfortunately plagued with the mental illness of Gender Identity Disorder are told by the advocates of homosexual behavior that their identity crisis is normal, or that what they believe themselves to be is what they are. (See original version of H.B. 3685, a.k.a. ENDA). Nevermind the genitals and chromosomes with which you were born, as they should be left in the proverbial trunk. Sexuality, in all of its glorious forms, is now some splintered or muddled combination of (a) how you were born, and (b) what you believe yourself to be. Try explaining that to your neighbor. According to the advocates of homosexual behavior, the new "Questioning" category represents those who are questioning their own sexual identity, or whether they believe that they might be "gay," "lesbian," "bisexual," or "transgender," but aren't really sure. What? How can someone not be sure about something that's been with them since birth? For years we've been hearing advocates argue that "I've always been gay," or "I've always known," or "I was born that way." Now, the tone has changed? In a day and age in our country where sexual boundaries are being shredded on a daily basis, and where men and women have more sexual "freedom" in so many ways than ever before, we're now being told that there's more confusion, instead of less? To this, there are many who are entitled to stand up and say "I told you so." Our society's current revolution of sexuality and homosexual behavior has our next generation more sexually confused than ever before. At record numbers, teenagers and college students are confused about whether they're a man or woman, confused about their "sexual orientation," and have no guidance regarding what is and is not appropriate sexual behavior. So what is the "Q" really all about? This part is actually easy. Since the mysterious "gay gene" upon which advocates of homosexual behavior have rested their cases has yet to appear, and because events like the Folsom Street Fair are starting to reveal to the public at large that homosexual behavior is unhealthy for our society, and because the studies regarding children raised in same-sex households are disturbingly alarming, advocates are developing a backup plan. They realize that their honeymoon as America's latest underprivileged "victim" is almost over, and with their soft underbelly clearly exposed, they don't want to lose the momentum that they've built. In addition to the destruction of all social norms, and any social or governmental institution that results in the establishment of norms regarding sexuality and sexual behavior, the advocates of homosexual behavior want a legal ticket to do whatever they want. Hence, the attack on marriage. Marriage, like nothing else, helps us understand that homosexual behavior plays no role in serving society, stabilizing society, or providing the next generation of our society. Advocates of homosexual behavior hate that and firmly believe that, by tearing down marriage, there will no longer be social or legal reasons for distinguishing their behavior from the behavior of others.Despite having lost every marriage battle that they've fought in the United States, save one, the advocates of homosexual behavior are transitioning directly to their ultimate goal - normalization of their behavior. Clearly, the inclusion of the "Q" is an admission that those who self-identify as "gay" or "lesbian" weren't born that way. Science never has shown it, and never will.
Thus, because science can't redeem their unredeemable behavior, the next best thing is for the advocates of homosexual behavior to try make the behavior itself worthy of redemption. If all of the G, L, B, T, and Q letters can all be placed into a cloak of legal protection, anything goes. Since you can't be born a "homosexual," if the "Q" accomplishes its mission, advocates of homosexual behavior no longer have to worry about proving to the world that they were "born that way." Rather, they've accomplished what they want-freedom to do what they want to do without fear of reprisal, social judgment, or denial of access to anything they want.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 762
MISANDRY
The Hatred of Men, Masculinity & Normal Heterosexuality
As Pervasive as fluoride in the water supply, MISANDRY so permeates the public sphere as to be one of the leading social indicators of the early 21st Century and a foundational pillar for modern Government, Media and the pathetic farce that passes as the social engineering field of Academentia. While the MISANDRY Lobby appears in many guises and both (DNA Based) genders, its core constituency has long consisted of a rabidly hateful sub group of Separatist / Neo-Exterminationist Womyn, who none the less have been extremely successful in promoting their campaign of Anti Male Hatred amongst a wider sympathetic audience.
One tactic long used to success by these Hyper Militant Misandrists is the 'Culture of Victimization' as a prelude to 'Gender War'; in which All Women are told by Some Womyn that All Men are nothing more than Brutish Raping Testosterone Poisoned Pigs (wrapped in whatever revolutionary pseudo babble currently in vogue in the academy) - out to oppress them for fun and profit. For those Women who do not buy in to such simplistic hateful lies these Twysted Systers have their own disempowering answer - They claim that any Women who doesn't share their Misandrist Hatred must be a victim of 'Oppression of the Patriarchy'; and thus Incapable of Thinking for Herself if she dares to dissent from the dogma of said Twysted Systers.
Perhaps one of the clearest examples of the peculiarly Orwellian 'Double Think' that characterizes the current Misandrist Hate Propaganda of the radical gender feminist / homosex spin machine, can be found in the following two articles dealing (after a fashion) with the Gender Issue of the Shorter Lifespan of Male Citizens... Only Different.
The first is a copy of the Notoriously Misandrist column written and syndicated nationwide under the heading of "Dear Abby"... Which has always been a prime source of BAMN BAMN (Bash Men, By Any Means Necessary) Hate Propaganda, but now manages to outdo the prior management in its casual trashing of Men. Consider if you will, oh ever discerning Lurker of the Net, the following letter and reply from 12/20/07, where 'Abby' pooh poohs the fears of another womyn with the consoling thought that Men are Supposed to Die Early, and like busses there is always another one along the route...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
WOMAN FRETS THAT HER FUTURE IN LOVE MAY BE ALL IN THE CARDS (12/20/07 - MediaNews)
DEAR ABBY: I have found the man I will be with for the rest of my life. I knew from the moment I met him that he was The One. We are very happy and very much in love. Ever since I was about 9, my mother and I have had our palms read, our tarot cards done, charted our birth signs, etc. It's a little superstitious, but hey -- we have fun with it. We still do it to this day. When I was 17, our palm reader proceeded to tell me about my life and explained that I will have two husbands, and my first husband will die. Abby, I can't stop thinking about this, and when I do I can't hold back the tears. I can't tell my boyfriend because, as anyone would, he'll think I am being silly.
I wouldn't take this so seriously if the palm reader hadn't been so accurate regarding past experiences in my life. I need some sort of relief from my fear because I'm afraid that when we're married I'll always be waiting for the day my husband doesn't come home. Please help me. -- MISERABLE IN MILWAUKEE
DEAR MISERABLE: I live in a community where psychics and palm readers are as omnipresent as head lice. While some of them can be remarkably accurate in their predictions, others are charlatans. What your letter illustrates is that while palm reading, tarot, etc. can make for lively entertainment, superstition can be a powerful and destructive force.
May I point out that statistically most women outlive men. Viewed in that light, what your psychic told you wasn't necessarily bad news. It could be interpreted to mean that you will have a long and happy union with the man you love. And when he predeceases you -- as most men do -- you will once again find love. And, honey, from my perspective, that's GOOD news.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The Second example of this Separatist / Meo_Exterminationist MISANDRY comes to us via The California Commission on the Status of Womyn - a Unique State Subsidized organ of Radical Gender Feminist Activism which uses tax money to support Radical Feminist / Homosex Political groups that in turn lobby the State for Money & Power to enforce their Mandatory Pandering Laws - recently forwarded through its system the attached piece of Old Media Hate Propaganda first published in the Sacramento Bee on 12/5/07 "Carlina Hansen: What women need in health care reform"
.
In a truly revealing expose of the types of "Feminist Logic" behind the Misandry that pervades our government, old media and the pathetic farce of Academentia, the author doesn't just ignore the Shorter Lifespans of this nation's Despised and Disposable Male Minority, but actually incorporates them in to a pity ploy demanding that the State exclusively focus and fund programs for Womyn - Because the Live Longer!
Talk about Darned if You Do and Dead if You Don't... We need to pay more "Attention" to the health demands of the Female Electoral Majority, because so many of their allegedly equal male counterparts are already dead! Thus - While it is certainly true that dead men don't rape, it is even more important to partisan Feminist politics that neither do they vote at election time... With the possible exception of certain precincts of Chicago that is. Ahem.
Anywayyyyy... This type of Orwellian Doublethink Propaganda is simply the logical extension of a Separatist / Neo-Exterminationist pogrom that is predicated on the [BAMN BAMN - to Bash Men, By Any Means Necessary] agenda that has long characterized the Radical Gender Feminist / Homosex lobby and the rabid, frothing, hind foot thumping Misandry that fuels their toxic bile dripping doubletalk.
The very fact that the State (and most counties) already has a tax subsidized and extremely powerful "Commission for Women" (as in Radical Feminist / Homosex activist Womyn) - and yet simultaneously Punishes Male (XY-DNA) Citizens who advocate for establishing a similar Commission for Men - is blatantly ignored by the author (and of course by the Commission for Womyn itself) who somehow maintain that the Female Electoral Majority "Hasn't received enough attention"...
Just how much attention will be "Enough" for these Male Hating Bigots and their pogrom of Misandry has yet to be established, although based on the complete lack of Men's Rights Advocates in Government, Media or Academentia, and the draconian Thought Policing actions authorized against those who do speak out (In Weimar CA it is a governmentally punishable act to be deemed to have: "Written letters to the editor expressing negative views on current women's issues") - it is a safe bet that All the Attention available is Just Barely Enough...
Except perhaps for the occasional visit to the cemetery to see where the guys hang out...
Ohso
Not merely the validity of experience but the very existence of external reality was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense. George Orwell 1984 On the Thought Police.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Forwarded for your information by the California Commission on the Status of Women www.women.ca.gov:
Carlina Hansen: What women need in health care reform
By Carlina Hansen - Special To The Bee December 5, 2007
As Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and the Democratic leadership in the Legislature negotiate... it's important to consider a California constituency that hasn't received enough attention during this debate: women.
They represent more than half the population, live longer and... Women use more health care services over the course of their lives than men.
http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/543262.html <http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/543262.html>
Commission on the Status of Women
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 34
Monkeys aren't people. Perhaps your mirror doesn't tell you that.
Read some Paul Shepard, maybe "Nature and Madness" if you need something to get excited about. Sounds like you're a bag of anger waiting for a cutpurse.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 762
When th
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 762
Kevin Abrams is the (Jewish) Co-Author of the important book about the destruction of an earlier Weimar Republic by the Homosex Hate Machine titled: "The Pink Swastika". His review of the book about the Syphilitic Coprophile Pervert Adolf Hitler by author Lothar Machtan (and the follow up comment) are relevant to this thread and so very very much more in modern Wiemar Kalifornia - Der Arnold, RINO Uber Kommandant, inc. Ohso.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Machtan's Missing Hitler, ,
By KEVIN E. ABRAMS (Vancouver British Columbia Canada) -
In the years leading up to the Nazi seizure of power, there was a little known Kultural conflict in Germany which simmered and flared throughout the Wiemar era (1919 - 1933). For reasons which may be evident to many in today's circle of homoerotic "friends," there were/are two opposing or antagonistic elements within the homosexualist community - one "gay," the other homosexual.
During the Weimar period, Germany's militant "gays" were led by Adolf Brandt. The Brandt faction published their own newspaper called the Eigene', meaning, Community of The Special or Elite, which became the German, then eventually American, Society for Human Rights. The "Elite" held pederasty as superior - an even `higher' form of love and a sexual aspect of superior leadership.
Members imagined themselves superior to "breeders" or "heterosexuals," and certainly FAR ahead of effeminate homosexuals whom they considered emasculated gossips.
During the 1920's and early 30's, the German homosexual movement was headed by the effeminate Jewish homosexualist and political activist, Dr. Magnus Hirshfeld. Hirshfeld founded the Scientific Humanitarian Committee for the emancipation of German homosexuals plus the Berlin based Institute of Sexology.
And whereas American sexologist Alfred Kinsey likely patterned his Bloomfield Indiana based sex Institute after Hirshfeld's example, because of the nature of his "work," Kinsey would more likely have "resonated" better with Brandt.
Hirshfeld worked for the repeal of section 175 of the German penal code, relating to homosexual crimes, which included pederasty, meaning the seduction and sexual molestation of young boys. And whereas Hirshfeld advocated homosexuals were members of a third sex or gender, i.e., a woman in a man's body, Brandt's clique would have nothing of this.
In fact Brands followers were proud of their ultra-masculine connection between "friends," and they largely despised Hirshfeld for his condemnation of pederasty, or man/boy "love." Brandt's group traced its roots back to Sparta and other homoerotic warrior cults which today finds seminal expression in NAMBLA, an acronym for The North American Man Boy Love Association.
Indeed, many dynamics of America's homosexualist Kulture are revealed in Chauncey's book, Gay New York, wherein the author describes the competition on the docks between the effeminate "homosexual" Drag Queens and female prostitutes for the New York "seafood" (sailor) trade.
Important to know is this . . . Self-identified effeminate homosexual drag queens strive mostly to seduce heterosexual men, not bugger young boys.
And whereas this crucial distinction may be obscure, it is THE key factor to our understanding of how Hitler, and his cult of homoerotic followers could at once be "gay" while simultaneously brutalizing some, but not all, homosexuals.
The truth of this riddle, understandably absent in the main theme of Lothar Machtan's book The Hidden Hitler, is that for identification purposes, Hitler WAS NOT a homosexual. Like most, if not all of Hitler's close associates, Hitler was a militant "gay" and a fellow traveler in the brutally violent, homofascist Community of The Special.
Like Germany between the flames and today in America, most violent crime committed against effeminate homosexuals is likely perpetrated by "ubermenchen" militant "gay" pederasts.
For the record, acts of "gay" violence have often been unjustly stamped on the backs of the so-called "straight" community by a mostly naive and often complicit media. Indeed, as Dr. Judith Reisman, author of Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences documents, and in what flies in the face of "embedded" popular notions, it is the militant "gay" pederast who disproportionately shares in America's sex crime statistics.
It is also worth knowing how Brandt's militant "gay" faction became the largest "gay" rights movement in Germany, and that in 1933 Brandt's faction eclipsed and destroyed Hirshfeld's Institute. In fact, the first book burning in Germany in May of 1933, was to destroy evidence held by Hirshfeld of sexual deviance among the Nazi rank and file.
The struggle in Germany between self-identified "third sex" homosexuals and "ubermenchen" militant "gay" pederasts is further documented in, The Pink Swastika: Homosexuality In The Nazi Party, first published in 1995, and now available in a newly updated and expanded 2002 fourth edition.
Cordially,
Kevin E. Abrams....
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 762
BRAVO for Mike McDermott - His insights are a sign of both intelligence and integrity, and I truly admire his style... Ohso
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The Times editorial staff (Dec. 31) claimed "abstinence-only" programs are depriving students of the opportunity to learn about comprehensive sex education and birth control. That assertion is false.
Concord
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 762
Don't Ask, Don't Tell, Don't Enforce? (FRC)
Today's Washington Times features a front-page story on statistics showing that discharges from the armed services because of homosexuality have declined as the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have continued.
Activists who are pushing for the full acceptance of homosexual behavior in the military say that it shows that the military needs homosexual service members and cannot afford to discharge them in time of war. But that is not the only possible interpretation of the numbers.
It may simply be that there are fewer homosexuals illicitly serving in the military now than there were in the 1990's. Homosexuals may simply not be enlisting in the military, either because we are at war or because they have come to realize that the statute which excludes them from military service will continue to be enforced.
The Clinton compromise called "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" has given rise to a myth that homosexuals are "allowed" to serve in the military, just not "openly." But statutory law excludes them altogether. The reason was illustrated last summer by the little-reported story of a homosexual soldier at Fort Bragg who infected his male civilian lover with HIV.
Does discharging service members for homosexuality waste military resources? Certainly--and homosexuals are to blame for illegally enlisting in the first place.
Additional Resources
Washington Times: 'Military ouster of gays plunges'
Center for Military Readiness
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 762
It should be interesting to hear Romney spin his position on the Boy Scouts - after this little gem... Ohso
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
GOP RACE LIKELY DOWN TO MCCAIN, ROMNEY (IVA)
With the withdrawal of Fred Thompson from the race, the shrinking fortunes and prospects of Mike Huckabee, and the failure of Ron Paul to gain sufficient traction, it increasingly looks like GOP conservatives looking for a standard bearer are going to be forced to choose between John McCain and Mitt Romney.
This will be a no-brainer for most social conservatives, despite profound misgivings about the sincerity and depth of Gov. Romney's newfound Reaganite convictions, which did not appear anywhere in his public life until about three years ago.
But McCain would be virtually a total disaster for those who truly believe conservative governing principles are best for America, American culture and American families. McCain has opposed the overturn of Roe v. Wade in the past (although he now says he supports it), supports life-destroying embryonic stem cell research, and opposes a federal marriage amendment. Plus, in the 2000 campaign, he lambasted social conservatives as "agents of intolerance."
He sponsored an amnesty immigration bill with Sen. Ted Kennedy, a bill that would have granted Social Security benefits to illegal aliens and which generated such an intense backlash from ordinary Americans that it quickly died an unlamented death just last summer. If he becomes president, the McCain-Kennedy amnesty bill is likely to resurface so quickly it will give you a nosebleed and become law a little more than a year from now. Although he is trying to say he has never supported amnesty, he plainly told the Tucson Citizen in 2003 that "amnesty has to be an important part" of any immigration reform.
McCain sponsored the flatly unconstitutional finance-reform bill that bears his name, which has resulted in the suppression of the message of pro-life and pro-family groups right when they are needed the most, when citizens are preparing to go to the polls. McCain wants to close Guantanamo and stop tough interrogation techniques of terrorists while giving them constitutional rights to which they are not entitled. He opposed President Bush's tax cuts on class warfare grounds, and has capitulated to Al Gore on global warming and drilling in ANWR.
He helped forge the "Gang of 14" which derailed a Republican effort to break the ability of a Democratic minority to filibuster conservative Supreme Court nominees, and voted to confirm both Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer. As Thomas Sowell pointed out today, "The media have dubbed him a 'maverick,' which is another way of spinning the fact that he is headstrong and unreliable." If McCain becomes the GOP nominee, many conservatives, as Pat Buchanan wrote today, will not be asking whom they should vote for, but whether they should vote at all.
Gov. Romney will soon come under additional scrutiny for blackballing the Boy Scouts during the 2002 winter Olympics in Salt Lake City, in an apparently craven capitulation to pressure from the homosexual lobby.
Texas Gov. Rick Perry has just completed a book on the Boy Scouts, due out next month, in which he recounts the frustration the BSA encountered when they offered the services of their 80,000 Scouts and 35,000 adult leaders in response to an urgent call for volunteers from Romney.
According to Perry, the Scouts were "advised that they were no longer welcome to participate," and Perry reports that Romney would not return calls from Boy Scout executives seeking an explanation, a puzzling outcome given Romney's own history as a Scout and Scout leader himself.
If the choice comes down to McCain and Romney, pro-family voters are likely to sigh and pull the lever - slowly and grudgingly - for Romney.
Townhall.com::"Maverick" and "Conservative" Aren't Synonyms::By David Limbaugh
Townhall.com::'Straight Talk' Express Takes Scenic Route To Truth::By Ann Coulter
Inside Politics - - The Washington Times, America's Newspaper
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 762
On the Left Coast (FRC)
This week I am in Southern California as a part of a series of pastor's conferences in support of the effort to collect one million signatures to put a marriage amendment onto the ballot this November. I am encouraged that pastors and church leaders increasingly understand the threat that exists and as a result are ready to take a stand.
This effort took on even greater urgency yesterday when the California Supreme Court announced it will start hearings on March 4 on the constitutionality of California's current statutory definition of marriage. A decision will come no later than the first week of June. For more information on the marriage effort in California, go to protectmarriage.com.
Speaking of California, just when you think Golden State leaders have run out of bad legislative ideas they come up with another humdinger. On Tuesday the state Assembly passed AB 624.
Under this measure every private, corporate or public operating foundation in California with assets of more than $250 million will be required to gather information about the gender, race, ethnicity and sexual orientation of its members and its board of directors and then publish that data on its website and in its annual report!
The foundations would also be required to provide this information on their employees and with the owners of the companies with which the foundation does business.
It doesn't stop there. The foundations will also have to collect this information on any group to whom they give a grant. If this measure succeeds, rest assured that it will not stop with these large foundations.
The measure will now be referred to the Senate which can act on the measure prior to the session's end on August 31.
![]()
![]()
Protectmarriage.com
![]()
Asking too much [LA Times]
![]()
Additional Resources
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 341
Some Choice the Liberals Oppose (FRC)
In December of 2002 President Bush issued an executive order which led to protections for faith-based groups that wish to participate in federal programs without sacrificing what many believe to be the key to the success of faith driven programs - a belief in God. Addressing this issue of "charitable choice" last month in his State of the Union speech President Bush called on Congress to "permanently extend Charitable Choice."
Next Tuesday the Senate Health Committee is scheduled to take up reauthorization of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Act (SAMHSA). In 2000, Congress put Charitable Choice language into SAMHSA by means of two laws. Now Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) is seeking to weaken Charitable Choice on the argument that it permits "government-funded job discrimination."
Charitable Choice exists in law in numerous programs and simply states that a faith-based organization does not lose its exemption permitting religious staffing merely by accepting government funds to provide social services.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 includes that exemption and U.S. courts have upheld the exemption. Please call the Senate Health Committee today and tell them to protect programs that work and stop discriminating against religious organizations, which offer among the most effective and compassionate social services available.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 338
I get it now. That's your bag isn't it. Your a "peeper". Your finely detailed reports are from the field, late at night, through the bushes, into bedrooms. Best not go any further. This is a family forum.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Carl: This place got a pool? Ty: Pool and a pond....... Pond be good for you.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1974
I think all that talk about "Resistant Harpies" in Ohso's original post is going to scare the lurkers away. They'll never take the plunge and join in now.
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 559
I think I had a Harpie at my bird feeder yesterday. According to the book it was a Yellow Breasted Harpie. We can say breasted with out Ohso 1-5 going off on another rant, can't we?
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 138
Stoney, Bazooka, Cowboy and Whirldpeas, you guys freakin crack me up!! I'm sitting here at my desk reading this stuff, but I gotta tell you, when I read this middle part here I laughed out loud!! I'm confused by this post. What is Ohso 1-5 trying to tell everyone? It's always the same stuff over and over again. There's no conspiracy theory here against you on these message boards, Ohso. It would just be nice to be able to actually sift through all the words and get to the heart of what you're trying to say. I know my efforts in speaking to you are probably in vain, Ohso. Thought I would give it a shot.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 762
Ford meets conditions; AFA suspends boycott I have some good news for you! AFA is suspending its two year boycott of Ford Motor Company. The conditions of the original agreement presented in fall 2005 have been met. We reached the conclusion that Ford had met the conditions of the agreement based on monitoring for several months. Individuals are free to purchase Ford vehicles again.
Your support of the boycott played a key role in convincing Ford to cease its significant support of the homosexual agenda. During the 24 months the boycott was in effect, Ford sales dropped an average of 8% per month. The boycott was not entirely responsible for the drop in sales, but it played a very significant role.
A total of 780,365 individuals signed AFA's Boycott Ford petition.
The original agreement contained four items:
1. Ford would not renew current promotions or create future incentives that give cash donations to homosexual organizations based on the purchase of a vehicle. 2. Ford would not make corporate donations to homosexual organizations that, as part of their activities, engage in political or social campaigns to promote civil unions or same-sex marriage. 3. Ford would stop giving cash and vehicle donations or endorsements to homosexual social activities such as Gay Pride parades. 4. Ford would cease all advertising on homosexual Web sites and through homosexual media outlets (magazines, television, radio) in the U.S. with the exception of $100,000 to be used by Volvo. The Volvo ads would be the same ads used in the general media and not aimed at the homosexual community specifically.
A few minor issues remain, and we will continue to bring these to the attention of Ford. But basically Ford has met the terms of the agreement. We are therefore suspending the boycott.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 762
PLANNED PARENTHOOD'S RACIST ROOTS
The racist bigotry recently exposed at Boise's Planned Parenthood has its roots in the long and unsavory past of this organization.
According to African-American Clenard Childress, founder of BlackGenocide.org, Planned Parenthood, under the aegis of its founder, Margaret Sanger, launched what was called "The Negro Project" in 1939. This project was designed to control the birth of "human weeds," Sanger's colorful term for black people.
To assist in promoting abortion, sterilization and birth control among blacks, Margaret Sanger wrote the following to a friend in the eugenics movement:
"We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don't want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." (emphasis added)
It would be hard to exaggerate the attitude of white supremacy and patronizing condescension found in those words. Yet Planned Parenthood continues to name its highest annual award after this woman.
Said Sen. Barack Obama last July to the Planned Parenthood Action Fund, "Thanks to all of you at Planned Parenthood for all the work that you are doing for women all across the country and for families all across the country - and for men who have enough sense to realize you are helping them." (How is Planned Parenthood "helping" men? By getting rid of promiscuously fathered children? By helping them conceal sex crimes against underage girls? What?)
Obama is either ignorant of the fact that 79% of Planned Parenthood clinics are located in minority communities, and that almost half of unborn black babies are aborted, or doesn't care. Blacks today represent a smaller percentage of our population than they did immediately after the Civil War.
This puts Obama far from the spirit of Martin Luther King, Jr., who in his famous Letter from a Birmingham Jail referred to the historic reality that "the early church put an end to such evils as infanticide." What Rev. King refers to as an evil, Sen. Obama refers to as a constitutional right.
Margaret Sanger Would Have Loved Barack Obama - Christian Newswire
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1251
Hey Ohso, I was always under the impression that these were "Discussion" boards. not "Propaganda" boards. You never seem to reply to anyone. You just keep rattling off one lengthy spiel after another. Or am I mistaken and this has been one very long discussion with yourself? Is it really necessary to take up so much bandwidth space for this form of therapy?
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 762
DEAR UNCLEAR ON THE UNGOOD CONCEPT: How nice of you to write to express your confusion. Like others before you (commonly referred to as the Resident Harpies) you raise the same ole cheesy whine to a drearily repetitive level of sophistry, all in the service of a transparently lame attempt at thought policing... The fact is that I am always willing to engage in a "Discussion" - provided it is about a topic germane to the thread, even at the alleged risk of 'filling up the internet'... Ahem.
However - it is not a discussion of the issues that you and your sorry ilk are looking for, but rather to simply hijack the boards and turn them in to an endless anti-Ohso Mau Mau session, the better to divert attention from the actual subject matter. Thus - If the only subject you are willing to discuss is just how much you hate Ohso, and why others should not read his posts, then there is plenty of room available for that also, and you and your pals can play that game all day long...Without me of course. I and my Lurking Public have better ways to employ our time than babysitting shrill harpies and their dirt dumping dives. Ohso. Not merely the validity of experience but the very existence of external reality was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense. George Orwell 1984 On the Thought Police...
IVA: An Oklahoma lawmaker has received death threats for speaking out against the normalization of homosexuality at a Republican event in January. She said, "According to God's word, that is not the right kind of lifestyle." Said a representative of Focus on the Family Action, "What is truly outrageous here is that a Christian elected official can be vilified - even have her life threatened - over simply speaking about the Bible's view of homosexuality." So much for tolerance from homosexuals in the Sooner State. (CitizenLink: Lawmaker Faces Death Threats over Statements on Homosexuality)
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1251
Ungood??? For someone who has such a command of the Thesaurus, couldn't you have come up with a better choice of words? Odd that you fall into a bit of projection by criticizing my post as "drearily repetitive". Have you ever bothered to put yourself in other people's shoes and imagined how drearily repetitive your tomes are? How large of an audience do you think your "lurking public" is since up until recently, hardly anyone responds to you? Perhaps a bit of self-dillusion? Where do you you get the impresssion that I hate you? By the content of what little of your posts I've had time to browse through, you're the one filled with hate. And by the way, your affectation of referring to yourself in the third person is strange at best.